In underground tunnelling near the working face, what is the maximum permissible concentration of respirable dust particles in the size range 0.5–5 microns (measured as number of particles per cubic centimetre) to protect workers and equipment?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 300 particles/cm3

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Dust control at the tunnel face is central to occupational health and visibility. The most harmful fraction comprises fine respirable particles, typically in the 0.5–5 micron range, which can penetrate deep into the lungs. This question checks recall of a benchmark ceiling for particle counts close to the working face to guide ventilation, water-spray, and housekeeping measures.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Location: immediately adjacent to the active tunnel face.
  • Particle size band: 0.5–5 microns.
  • Metric: number of particles per cubic centimetre (particles/cm3).
  • Objective: identify the maximum recommended concentration for safe operations.


Concept / Approach:
Engineering controls (face ventilation, scrubbers, misting) target keeping airborne fines below a practical, easy-to-monitor threshold. Particle-count ceilings complement mass-concentration limits (mg/m3) used in hygiene standards. As a memory aid for site practice, many syllabi adopt 300 particles/cm3 as the not-to-exceed guideline for the critical 0.5–5 micron band at the face.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the hazardous fraction: 0.5–5 μm particles are respirable and remain airborne.Relate to tunnel-face controls: apply ventilation rate, sprays, and sequencing to reduce counts.Select the standard ceiling used in exam practice: 300 particles/cm3.


Verification / Alternative check:

If portable counters show counts trending near 300 particles/cm3, increase air quantity at the face, improve wet drilling, or delay re-entry after blasting until counts drop.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

200 or 250 particles/cm3: stricter than the commonly taught threshold; conservative but not the standard reference value.400 or 450 particles/cm3: too lenient; may allow visibility loss and higher health risk.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing particle-count thresholds with mass-based limits (mg/m3); the two metrics are related but not interchangeable.Measuring too far from the face where dilution lowers counts, giving a false sense of safety.


Final Answer:

300 particles/cm3

More Questions from Tunnelling

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion