A moving-iron voltmeter has coil resistance 500 Ω and inductance 1 H. It reads 250 V on 250 V DC. With an added 2000 Ω series resistor, what will it read on 250 V, 50 Hz AC? (Assume the scale is effectively linear over this range.)

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 248 V

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Moving-iron (MI) voltmeters are commonly used on AC and DC. Their coil has resistance and inductance, so at AC the impedance magnitude is greater than the DC resistance, leading to a slightly smaller current for the same applied RMS voltage. If the instrument scale is set by a DC calibration point, the AC reading can shift because the deflection depends on current (approximately linear in this operating region per the problem statement).


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Coil: R_coil = 500 Ω, L = 1 H.
  • Series resistor: R_s = 2000 Ω.
  • DC calibration: 250 V produces full-scale indication (i.e., I_DC = 250 / (R_coil + R_s) = 250 / 2500 = 0.1 A).
  • AC test: 250 V, f = 50 Hz; assume effective linearity of indication with coil current near this point.


Concept / Approach:
For AC, total impedance Z = √(R_total^2 + (ωL)^2), where R_total = R_coil + R_s and ω = 2πf. Compute AC current I_AC = V / |Z|. With the problem's linear-scale assumption, indicated voltage ≈ 250 * (I_AC / I_DC).


Step-by-Step Solution:

R_total = 500 + 2000 = 2500 Ω.ω = 2π * 50 ≈ 314.16 rad/s; X_L = ωL ≈ 314.16 Ω.|Z| = √(2500^2 + 314.16^2) ≈ 2519.66 Ω.I_AC = 250 / 2519.66 ≈ 0.0992 A; I_DC = 0.1 A.Indicated ≈ 250 * (0.0992 / 0.1) ≈ 248 V.


Verification / Alternative check:

The small increase in impedance from inductive reactance slightly lowers current and reading compared with DC.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Values above 250 V contradict the increased impedance at AC; 252 V or 260 V are not plausible; 250 V ignores reactance.


Common Pitfalls:

Forgetting series resistance; using R instead of |Z| at AC; assuming MI response is strictly I^2 when the problem directs a linear assumption near calibration.


Final Answer:

248 V

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion