More Questions from Highway Engineering

Standard carriageway widths as per common IRC practice According to typical Indian Road Congress (IRC) guidelines, which of the following carriageway widths are correct?

Civil Engineering Highway Engineering Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    3.75 m for a single-lane road
  • B
    7.0 m for two lanes without raised kerbs
  • C
    7.5 m for two lanes with raised kerbs
  • D
    10.5 m for a three-lane pavement
  • E
    All the above

Answer

Correct Answer: All the above

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Carriageway width determines lane capacity, safety margins, and comfort. IRC standards provide typical widths by facility type and roadside elements (e.g., presence of raised kerbs).

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Standard two-way and multi-lane categories.
  • Urban kerbed sections tend to be slightly wider than rural without kerbs.

Concept / Approach:Common IRC values include 3.75 m for single-lane, 7.0 m for two-lane without raised kerbs, 7.5 m for two-lane with raised kerbs, and 10.5 m for three-lane facilities. These provide adequate clearance and shy distances.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Check each item against the standard catalogue.All listed values match widely used IRC practice.

Verification / Alternative check:Design manuals and typical cross-sections align with these nominal dimensions, subject to context-specific adjustments.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Since A–D are each correct, “All the above” is the correct consolidated choice.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing carriageway width with roadway width (which adds shoulders and medians).

Final Answer:All the above

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion