Q: Projectile speed at a given height (energy method): A projectile is launched with speed 100.3 m/s at 60°. Neglecting air resistance, what is its speed when it is passing a height of 100 m above the launch level?

Introduction / Context: Projectile motion with no air resistance conserves mechanical energy when measured relative to a fixed datum. Therefore, the speed at a given height depends only on the initial speed and the gain in potential energy, not on the firing angle (except for feasibility of reaching that height). Given Data / Assumptions: Initial speed u = 100.3 m/s; height h = 100 m. Gravity g ≈ 9.81 m/s^2; air resistance neglected. Launch and observation height measured from same level. Concept / Approach: Use energy: 0.5 * m * u^2 = 0.5 * m * v^2 + m * g * h. Mass cancels. Solve for v. The direction components do not matter for the magnitude of speed when using energy balance. Step-by-Step Solution: Apply energy conservation: v^2 = u^2 − 2 * g * h.Compute 2 * g * h = 2 * 9.81 * 100 = 1962.Compute u^2 ≈ (100.3)^2 ≈ 10060.09.Then v^2 ≈ 10060.09 − 1962 = 8098.09 → v ≈ √8098.09 ≈ 90.0 m/s. Verification / Alternative check: Angle independence: any angle that reaches 100 m yields the same speed magnitude at that height (ignoring drag). A quick check with u = 100 m/s would give v ≈ √(10000 − 1962) ≈ 89.4 m/s, consistent with the above. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 70–85 m/s: underestimate energy remaining after gaining 100 m of height. Values above 90 m/s would require less height or higher initial speed. Common Pitfalls: Trying to split into horizontal and vertical components and then recombining—valid but longer—while energy is faster and less error-prone. Final Answer: 90 m/s

Q: Velocity – scalar or vector? Classify the physical quantity “velocity” with respect to directionality and magnitude.

Introduction / Context: Precise classification of kinematic quantities is fundamental to mechanics. Confusing speed and velocity leads to incorrect vector equations of motion, momentum, and work-energy analyses. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard Newtonian mechanics without relativistic effects. Velocity is defined as the time rate of change of displacement vector. Concept / Approach: Velocity has both magnitude and direction. It is expressed as v = dx/dt for one dimension, or as a vector derivative of position r(t). Speed is the magnitude |v| and is scalar. Many laws (e.g., momentum p = m * v) require vectors; direction changes matter even at constant speed (uniform circular motion). Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that displacement is vectorial.Differentiate displacement with respect to time → velocity inherits direction.Conclude velocity is a vector, while speed is its scalar magnitude. Verification / Alternative check: Component form in 2D or 3D, v = (vx, vy, vz). Directional changes at constant |v| imply acceleration (centripetal), reinforcing the vector nature. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Scalar: confuses speed with velocity. “Scalar as well as vector”: definitions are mutually exclusive. “None”: incorrect because the vector definition is standard. Pseudo-scalar: not applicable to velocity. Common Pitfalls: Interchanging speed and velocity in energy and momentum problems. Final Answer: A vector quantity

Q: Efficiency of a simple lifting machine (work output / work input): A 50 kg load is raised by 2.5 cm while an effort of 12.5 kg moves through 40 cm. Assuming ideal alignment and no other losses than friction, what is the machine efficiency?

Introduction / Context: Efficiency of simple machines compares useful output work to input work. Expressing loads and efforts in consistent “kgf-cm” (or converting to newton-metres consistently) leads to the same efficiency ratio, provided the same gravity factor multiplies both sides and cancels out. Given Data / Assumptions: Load L = 50 kgf (kilogram-force), rises by h_L = 2.5 cm. Effort E = 12.5 kgf, moves by h_E = 40 cm. Quasi-static motion; ignore kinetic energy change. Concept / Approach: Work output = L * h_L; work input = E * h_E (when using kgf and centimetres). Efficiency η = (Output / Input) * 100%. Alternatively, use mechanical advantage MA = L / E and velocity ratio VR = h_E / h_L; then η = (MA / VR) * 100%. Both approaches are equivalent if units are consistent. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute MA = L / E = 50 / 12.5 = 4.Compute VR = h_E / h_L = 40 / 2.5 = 16.Efficiency η = (MA / VR) * 100% = (4 / 16) * 100% = 25%.Direct work check: Output = 50 * 2.5 = 125 kgf·cm; Input = 12.5 * 40 = 500 kgf·cm; η = 125 / 500 = 0.25 = 25%. Verification / Alternative check: The two independent routes (MA/VR and direct work) agree. Using newton-metres would multiply both numerator and denominator by the same g factor, cancelling out and giving the same 25%. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%: arise from arithmetic errors or mixing distances/units. Common Pitfalls: Confusing cm and m; mixing kg (mass) and kgf (force) without consistency; using MA alone as “efficiency”. Final Answer: 25%

Q: Maximum range condition (ideal projectile without air resistance): For a given launch speed on level ground, which projection angle gives the maximum horizontal range?

Introduction / Context: In ideal projectile motion (no air drag, level launch and landing), the range depends on the sine of twice the launch angle. Identifying the angle that maximizes this trigonometric factor is a classic optimization in elementary mechanics. Given Data / Assumptions: Constant launch speed u; flat terrain with same launch and landing elevations. No air resistance; constant gravitational acceleration g. Concept / Approach: The range on level ground is R = (u^2 / g) * sin(2θ). For fixed u and g, maximizing R is equivalent to maximizing sin(2θ). The sine function attains its maximum value of 1 at 2θ = 90°, i.e., θ = 45°. Step-by-Step Solution: Write range: R = (u^2/g) * sin(2θ).Maximize sin(2θ) → maximum is 1 at 2θ = 90°.Therefore θ_max = 45°. Verification / Alternative check: Angles θ and (90° − θ) yield the same range (since sin(2θ) = sin(180° − 2θ)); among practical angles, 45° is the symmetric mid-point providing maximum range. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 30° and 60° produce the same range but less than the maximum. “None” is incorrect under the ideal assumptions. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting the effect of air resistance (which can shift the optimal angle below 45° in real life), or confusing elevation differences which modify the formula. Final Answer: 45°

Question 1

Resultant of perpendicular forces: 6 N and 8 N at right angles Two forces of 6 N and 8 N act at right angles to each other. What is the magnitude of their resultant?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Combining non-collinear forces requires vector addition. When forces are perpendicular, the Pythagorean theorem directly gives the resultant magnitude. This appears frequently in statics and dynamics when resolving orthogonal components. Given Data / Assumptions: Magnitudes: F1 = 6 N, F2 = 8 N. Right-angle between vectors. Planar force system. Concept / Approach: For perpendicular vectors A and B, |A + B| = √(A² + B²). This arises from the dot product with zero cross term since cos 90° = 0. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute squares: 6² = 36, 8² = 64.Sum: 36 + 64 = 100.Square root: √100 = 10. Verification / Alternative check: Construct a 6-8-10 right triangle (a scaled 3-4-5 triangle), confirming the resultant magnitude is 10 N. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5 N and 7 N are too small; 12 N equals the arithmetic sum, not the vector sum; 8 N equals one component only. Common Pitfalls: Adding magnitudes arithmetically; forgetting that perpendicular components combine quadratically. Final Answer: 10 N

Question 2

Definition of power in mechanics Select the correct expression for power in terms of work and time.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Power quantifies how fast work is done or energy is transferred. It is a rate, not a cumulative quantity. Correctly identifying its relationship to work and time is essential for engine sizing, electrical systems, and machine design. Given Data / Assumptions: Classical definitions: work W in joules, time t in seconds. Average power considered; instantaneous power is dW/dt. Consistent SI units (watt = joule per second). Concept / Approach: Average power P_avg = W / t. Instantaneous power P = dW/dt. In translational motion, P = F · v, the scalar product of force and velocity, consistent with P = dW/dt since dW = F · ds. Step-by-Step Solution: Start from definition: power is rate of doing work.Therefore P = W / t (average) or P = dW/dt (instantaneous).Check units: joule per second equals watt. Verification / Alternative check: For constant force F and constant velocity v in the same direction, P = F v, which integrated over time reproduces W = P t. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (a), (c), (d), and (e) do not match the definition or have inconsistent dimensions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing energy with power; mixing average and instantaneous forms without noting the derivative. Final Answer: Power = work / time

Question 3

Projectile motion: horizontal range formula For a projectile launched with initial speed u at an angle α to the horizontal (neglecting air resistance), which expression gives the horizontal range R on level ground?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Projectile range on level ground is among the most common kinematics results. It relates launch speed and angle to the horizontal distance traveled, assuming uniform gravity and no air drag. Given Data / Assumptions: Initial speed u, projection angle α. Flat landing at the same elevation as launch. Constant gravitational acceleration g, no air resistance. Concept / Approach: Resolve velocity into horizontal and vertical components and use independent motions. Time of flight depends on vertical motion; horizontal range equals horizontal speed multiplied by time of flight. Step-by-Step Solution: Horizontal velocity: u_x = u cos α; vertical velocity: u_y = u sin α.Time of flight: T = 2 u_y / g = 2 u sin α / g.Range: R = u_x * T = (u cos α) * (2 u sin α / g) = (2 u^2 sin α cos α) / g.Using identity sin 2α = 2 sin α cos α → R = (u^2 sin 2α) / g. Verification / Alternative check: Maximum range occurs at α = 45°, giving R_max = u^2 / g, which matches the formula with sin 90° = 1. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b) is equivalent to (a) but lacks the identity recognition; only one should be selected. (c) and (d) are incomplete component squares. (e) is dimensionally incorrect (missing u factor). Common Pitfalls: Forgetting the double-angle identity; applying the level-ground formula to unequal elevations without modification. Final Answer: R = (u^2 sin 2α) / g

Question 4

Impact of a ball on a fixed plane (smooth line of impact): A ball moving at 5 m/s strikes a fixed smooth plane at an angle of 45° to the line of impact (normal). After impact, its direction is again equally inclined to the line of impact. If the coe…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests rigid-body impact decomposition into normal and tangential components, and the definition of the coefficient of restitution. The phrase “equally inclined to the line of impact” indicates that the direction of motion after impact makes the same angle with the line of impact (the common normal) as the incident direction, a frequent textbook condition used to relate components after impact when friction impulses are present. Given Data / Assumptions: Initial speed v = 5 m/s. Angle to the line of impact (normal) before impact = 45°. Coefficient of restitution e = 0.5 (defined along the normal). “Equally inclined after impact” implies the post-impact angle to the normal also equals 45° (symmetric inclination), achievable if the tangential component scales consistently with the normal component due to frictional impulse during impact. Concept / Approach: Let u_n and u_t be the normal and tangential components before impact; v_n and v_t be those after impact. By restitution, the normal component magnitude scales as v_n = e * u_n (reversed direction). If the outgoing direction is equally inclined to the normal (45°), then the ratio v_t / |v_n| must equal tan 45° = 1, hence v_t = e * u_n as well. Since initially u_t = u_n at 45°, we infer v_t = e * u_t. Therefore every component is reduced by the same factor e, and the speed scales by e overall: v_after = e * v_before. Step-by-Step Solution: Resolve initial velocity: u_n = v * cos 45°, u_t = v * sin 45° = equal.Restitution along normal: |v_n| = e * u_n.Equal inclination after impact (45°) requires v_t / |v_n| = 1 → v_t = e * u_n = e * u_t.Thus, the velocity vector scales by e, so speed v′ = e * v = 0.5 * 5 = 2.5 m/s. Verification / Alternative check: If e = 1 (perfectly elastic), the same reasoning would yield v′ = v with equal angles, matching the familiar mirror reflection. For e = 0.5, the direction constraint forces proportional component reduction, hence v′ = 0.5 v. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.5 and 1.5 m/s: too small; they do not satisfy the equal-angle constraint with e = 0.5. 3.5 and 4.5 m/s: these ignore the required proportional scaling of both components; they are inconsistent with the given condition. Common Pitfalls: Assuming the plane is perfectly smooth (no tangential impulse), which would keep tangential velocity unchanged and alter the outgoing angle; here the phrase “equally inclined” implies a tangential impulse acting to match angles. Final Answer: 2.5 m/s

Question 5

Second moment of area of a thin circular ring: For a thin ring with external diameter D and internal diameter d, what is the area moment of inertia about the centroidal axis perpendicular to the plane of the ring?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The second moment of area (area moment of inertia) quantifies a cross-section’s resistance to bending. For circular shapes and annuli, the dependence on the fourth power of diameter is particularly strong, which is important in comparing stiffness of tubes versus solid rods for the same material and weight. Given Data / Assumptions: Thin circular ring (annulus) with outer diameter D and inner diameter d. Centroidal axis perpendicular to the plane (i.e., polar axis through center). Standard thin-walled/annulus formulae are applicable. Concept / Approach: For a solid circle about its centroidal axis perpendicular to the plane, the second moment of area about x or y is I = (π/64) D^4; the polar moment J = I_x + I_y = (π/32) D^4. For an annulus, subtract the inner hole contribution of corresponding diameter d. Thus I = (π/64) (D^4 − d^4) about a centroidal in-plane axis, and J = (π/32) (D^4 − d^4). Therefore the dependence is on the difference of fourth powers, not their sum or product. Step-by-Step Solution: Start with solid disk: I_solid = (π/64) D^4.Subtract inner void: I_void = (π/64) d^4.Annulus result: I = (π/64)(D^4 − d^4).Hence the correct proportionality is (D^4 − d^4). Verification / Alternative check: If d → 0, the expression reduces to solid circle; if d → D, I → 0, consistent with vanishing area. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (D^4 + d^4) or its half: incorrect dependence; would not vanish as d → D. (D^4 * d^4): dimensionally inconsistent without normalization. Zero: only true in the trivial limit of zero thickness. Common Pitfalls: Confusing polar moment with planar second moment; mixing up constants (π/64 vs π/32). Final Answer: Proportional to (D^4 - d^4)

Question 6

Average power in vertical climbing (work–energy over time): A 50 kg student climbs a vertical rope of 8 m in 10 s (neglect air resistance). Estimate the average power developed (use g ≈ 9.81 m/s^2).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Average power in mechanics equals total work done divided by time. When lifting a body vertically at roughly constant speed, work equals the increase in gravitational potential energy. This calculation is common in biomechanics, sports science, and machine sizing problems for hoists and winches. Given Data / Assumptions: Mass m = 50 kg; height h = 8 m; time t = 10 s. Acceleration due to gravity g ≈ 9.81 m/s^2. Assume steady climbing (kinetic energy change negligible). Concept / Approach: Total mechanical work against gravity is W = m * g * h. Average power P_avg = W / t. Units: joules for work (N*m) and watts (J/s) for power. Minor numerical rounding is acceptable for practical answers (e.g., g = 9.8 m/s^2). Step-by-Step Solution: Compute work: W = 50 * 9.81 * 8 J.W = 50 * 78.48 = 3924 J.Average power: P = 3924 / 10 = 392.4 W.Rounded to two significant digits → approximately 400 W. Verification / Alternative check: If g is rounded to 10 m/s^2, W = 50 * 10 * 8 = 4000 J and P = 400 W—same rounded result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: ≈ 500 W: requires higher speed or mass; overestimates work done. ≈ 4000 W: off by a factor of 10 (confuses work in joules with power). “None”: incorrect because 400 W is a reasonable estimate. ≈ 250 W: underestimates required power. Common Pitfalls: Mixing joules and watts; ignoring time; using weight in kgf without consistent conversion. Final Answer: ≈ 400 W

Question 7

Laws of kinetic (dynamic) friction – conceptual check: Which statements correctly describe the behavior of kinetic friction between two surfaces in relative motion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Friction models are simplified but very useful for engineering calculations. The classical Coulomb model captures the first-order behavior of dry kinetic friction. Understanding these laws helps in analyzing brakes, clutches, belt drives, and any contact system experiencing sliding. Given Data / Assumptions: Dry friction (no significant lubrication hydrodynamics). Surfaces and conditions are within moderate sliding speed ranges. Normal reaction N is well-defined and constant for the comparison. Concept / Approach: The basic kinetic friction model is F_k = μ_k * N, where μ_k is the coefficient of kinetic friction. Typically μ_k < μ_s (limiting or static coefficient). The friction force direction always opposes relative motion. Empirical trends show that μ_k is roughly constant at low to moderate speeds but slightly decreases as speed rises due to thermal and dynamic effects at the interface. Step-by-Step Solution: State directionality: friction opposes motion (Option A).Relate magnitude: F_k ≈ μ_k N with μ_k a little less than μ_s (Option B).Note speed effect: μ_k weakly decreases with speed in many materials (Option C).Therefore, all statements A–C are consistent → choose “All of the above.” Verification / Alternative check: Tribology data for metals and polymers commonly show μ_k lower than μ_s and often declining slightly with sliding speed until mixed or hydrodynamic regimes appear. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “None” contradicts well-established dry friction behavior. Common Pitfalls: Assuming μ_k is independent of speed under all conditions; ignoring temperature rise, wear, or lubrication effects. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 8

Projectile speed at a given height (energy method): A projectile is launched with speed 100.3 m/s at 60°. Neglecting air resistance, what is its speed when it is passing a height of 100 m above the launch level?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Projectile motion with no air resistance conserves mechanical energy when measured relative to a fixed datum. Therefore, the speed at a given height depends only on the initial speed and the gain in potential energy, not on the firing angle (except for feasibility of reaching that height). Given Data / Assumptions: Initial speed u = 100.3 m/s; height h = 100 m. Gravity g ≈ 9.81 m/s^2; air resistance neglected. Launch and observation height measured from same level. Concept / Approach: Use energy: 0.5 * m * u^2 = 0.5 * m * v^2 + m * g * h. Mass cancels. Solve for v. The direction components do not matter for the magnitude of speed when using energy balance. Step-by-Step Solution: Apply energy conservation: v^2 = u^2 − 2 * g * h.Compute 2 * g * h = 2 * 9.81 * 100 = 1962.Compute u^2 ≈ (100.3)^2 ≈ 10060.09.Then v^2 ≈ 10060.09 − 1962 = 8098.09 → v ≈ √8098.09 ≈ 90.0 m/s. Verification / Alternative check: Angle independence: any angle that reaches 100 m yields the same speed magnitude at that height (ignoring drag). A quick check with u = 100 m/s would give v ≈ √(10000 − 1962) ≈ 89.4 m/s, consistent with the above. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 70–85 m/s: underestimate energy remaining after gaining 100 m of height. Values above 90 m/s would require less height or higher initial speed. Common Pitfalls: Trying to split into horizontal and vertical components and then recombining—valid but longer—while energy is faster and less error-prone. Final Answer: 90 m/s

Question 9

Velocity – scalar or vector? Classify the physical quantity “velocity” with respect to directionality and magnitude.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Precise classification of kinematic quantities is fundamental to mechanics. Confusing speed and velocity leads to incorrect vector equations of motion, momentum, and work-energy analyses. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard Newtonian mechanics without relativistic effects. Velocity is defined as the time rate of change of displacement vector. Concept / Approach: Velocity has both magnitude and direction. It is expressed as v = dx/dt for one dimension, or as a vector derivative of position r(t). Speed is the magnitude |v| and is scalar. Many laws (e.g., momentum p = m * v) require vectors; direction changes matter even at constant speed (uniform circular motion). Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that displacement is vectorial.Differentiate displacement with respect to time → velocity inherits direction.Conclude velocity is a vector, while speed is its scalar magnitude. Verification / Alternative check: Component form in 2D or 3D, v = (vx, vy, vz). Directional changes at constant |v| imply acceleration (centripetal), reinforcing the vector nature. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Scalar: confuses speed with velocity. “Scalar as well as vector”: definitions are mutually exclusive. “None”: incorrect because the vector definition is standard. Pseudo-scalar: not applicable to velocity. Common Pitfalls: Interchanging speed and velocity in energy and momentum problems. Final Answer: A vector quantity

Question 10

Efficiency of a simple lifting machine (work output / work input): A 50 kg load is raised by 2.5 cm while an effort of 12.5 kg moves through 40 cm. Assuming ideal alignment and no other losses than friction, what is the machine efficiency?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Efficiency of simple machines compares useful output work to input work. Expressing loads and efforts in consistent “kgf-cm” (or converting to newton-metres consistently) leads to the same efficiency ratio, provided the same gravity factor multiplies both sides and cancels out. Given Data / Assumptions: Load L = 50 kgf (kilogram-force), rises by h_L = 2.5 cm. Effort E = 12.5 kgf, moves by h_E = 40 cm. Quasi-static motion; ignore kinetic energy change. Concept / Approach: Work output = L * h_L; work input = E * h_E (when using kgf and centimetres). Efficiency η = (Output / Input) * 100%. Alternatively, use mechanical advantage MA = L / E and velocity ratio VR = h_E / h_L; then η = (MA / VR) * 100%. Both approaches are equivalent if units are consistent. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute MA = L / E = 50 / 12.5 = 4.Compute VR = h_E / h_L = 40 / 2.5 = 16.Efficiency η = (MA / VR) * 100% = (4 / 16) * 100% = 25%.Direct work check: Output = 50 * 2.5 = 125 kgf·cm; Input = 12.5 * 40 = 500 kgf·cm; η = 125 / 500 = 0.25 = 25%. Verification / Alternative check: The two independent routes (MA/VR and direct work) agree. Using newton-metres would multiply both numerator and denominator by the same g factor, cancelling out and giving the same 25%. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%: arise from arithmetic errors or mixing distances/units. Common Pitfalls: Confusing cm and m; mixing kg (mass) and kgf (force) without consistency; using MA alone as “efficiency”. Final Answer: 25%

Question 11

Maximum range condition (ideal projectile without air resistance): For a given launch speed on level ground, which projection angle gives the maximum horizontal range?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In ideal projectile motion (no air drag, level launch and landing), the range depends on the sine of twice the launch angle. Identifying the angle that maximizes this trigonometric factor is a classic optimization in elementary mechanics. Given Data / Assumptions: Constant launch speed u; flat terrain with same launch and landing elevations. No air resistance; constant gravitational acceleration g. Concept / Approach: The range on level ground is R = (u^2 / g) * sin(2θ). For fixed u and g, maximizing R is equivalent to maximizing sin(2θ). The sine function attains its maximum value of 1 at 2θ = 90°, i.e., θ = 45°. Step-by-Step Solution: Write range: R = (u^2/g) * sin(2θ).Maximize sin(2θ) → maximum is 1 at 2θ = 90°.Therefore θ_max = 45°. Verification / Alternative check: Angles θ and (90° − θ) yield the same range (since sin(2θ) = sin(180° − 2θ)); among practical angles, 45° is the symmetric mid-point providing maximum range. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 30° and 60° produce the same range but less than the maximum. “None” is incorrect under the ideal assumptions. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting the effect of air resistance (which can shift the optimal angle below 45° in real life), or confusing elevation differences which modify the formula. Final Answer: 45°

Question 12

In basic machines (Engineering Mechanics): What is the velocity ratio (VR) of a differential wheel and axle with wheel radius R and two axle radii r1 and r2 (r1 ≠ r2)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The differential wheel and axle is a classic lifting machine studied in Engineering Mechanics and Strength of Materials. It combines two axles of slightly different radii on the same spindle with a common wheel. Understanding its velocity ratio (VR) is essential for predicting ideal mechanical advantage (IMA) and for comparing theoretical performance versus real efficiency with friction. Given Data / Assumptions: Wheel radius = R. Two axle radii = r1 and r2, with r1 ≠ r2. Light, inextensible rope; idealized, frictionless pulleys for the VR derivation. Small differential between r1 and r2 to obtain high VR. Concept / Approach: In one revolution, the rope wound on the larger axle shortens the load side, while the rope unwound from the smaller axle lengthens it, producing a net downward movement of the load equal to the difference of the circumferences on the two axles. Input movement equals the circumference at the wheel. VR is the ratio of input displacement to load displacement in one revolution. Step-by-Step Solution: Input displacement per revolution = 2 * π * R.Shortening on larger axle = 2 * π * r1; lengthening on smaller axle = 2 * π * r2.Net load movement per revolution = 2 * π * (r1 - r2).Velocity ratio VR = (2 * π * R) / (2 * π * (r1 - r2)) = 2R / (r1 - r2). Verification / Alternative check: If r1 approaches r2, the denominator becomes small and VR becomes large, which matches the practical purpose of using a differential arrangement for higher mechanical advantage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B and D: Use a sum r1 + r2, which does not reflect the differential action. C: Inverts the correct relationship and places 2R in the denominator. E: Misses the factor 2 from the two rope segments supporting the load. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting that two rope segments support the load and confusing circumference differences with radius differences. Real systems include friction; thus actual mechanical advantage < VR. Final Answer: VR = 2R / (r1 - r2)

Question 13

In classical mechanics: The inherent property of a body that resists any change in its state of rest or uniform straight-line motion is called ________.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One of the most fundamental ideas in Newtonian mechanics is the tendency of bodies to maintain their current state of motion unless acted upon by an external unbalanced force. This resistance to change is a hallmark of inertial behavior and connects directly to Newton’s First Law and the concept of inertial reference frames. Given Data / Assumptions: No external unbalanced forces act on the body (idealized case). Motion is measured in an inertial frame (non-accelerating frame). Uniform motion means constant velocity (constant speed in a straight line). Concept / Approach: Inertia is the property of matter that resists changes in velocity (both speed and direction).Mass quantifies inertia numerically; greater mass means greater resistance to acceleration under the same applied force.Momentum (p = m * v) describes the quantity of motion but is not itself the “reluctance” property.Weight (W = m * g) is a gravitational force, not a property of resistance to kinematic change. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the phrase “offers reluctance to change” → inertia.Recognize that mass measures inertia, but the name of the property is “inertia.”Eliminate momentum and weight as they are, respectively, a state variable and a force due to gravity. Verification / Alternative check: From Newton’s Second Law: a = F / m. For a given force F, a larger mass m yields smaller acceleration, confirming mass as the measure of inertia and “inertia” as the property being tested. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Momentum: Depends on velocity; it is not the “reluctance to change.” Mass: Numerical measure of inertia, not the name of the property asked. Weight: Force due to gravity; changes with location (g). Impetus: Historical term, not standard in modern mechanics. Common Pitfalls: Confusing the property (inertia) with its measure (mass) or with gravitational force (weight). Final Answer: Inertia

Question 14

Vertical loop dynamics (aviation mechanics): A pilot flies a small aircraft in a vertical loop of radius r. If he experiences weightlessness at the top of the loop, what speed v must the plane have at that top position (take gravitational accelerati…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Looping maneuvers are analyzed with circular motion dynamics. At the top of a vertical loop, a pilot feels weightless when the normal reaction from the seat becomes zero. That condition sets a critical relationship between speed, loop radius, and gravitational acceleration. Given Data / Assumptions: Radius of loop = r. Acceleration due to gravity = g. Point-mass aircraft model at the loop apex; no lift contribution at the instant (worst case for weightlessness criterion). Concept / Approach: At the top, centripetal acceleration a_c must be provided entirely by gravity when apparent weight (normal reaction N) is zero. Using the circular motion condition a_c = v^2 / r and setting N = 0 leads directly to the required speed for weightlessness. Step-by-Step Solution: At top: sum of forces toward center = m * v^2 / r.Toward center is downward; gravity contributes m * g; normal reaction N = 0 for weightlessness.Therefore m * g = m * v^2 / r → v^2 = g * r.Hence v = √(g r). Verification / Alternative check: Any speed less than √(g r) makes v^2 / r < g, so N must act downward (cannot), meaning the pilot would not stay in contact without restraints. Speeds greater than √(g r) create positive normal forces (apparent weight). Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Zero speed cannot maintain the loop and ignores centripetal requirements. C: g r is acceleration units times length; missing the square root makes dimensions incorrect. D: √(2 g r) corresponds to a larger speed than necessary for N = 0. E: Infinite speed is physically unnecessary and impossible. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to set N = 0 for weightlessness; neglecting direction of centripetal acceleration at the apex; dimensional mistakes such as choosing g r instead of √(g r). Final Answer: v = √(g r)

Question 15

Law of Triangle of Forces (equilibrium check at a point): Which statement correctly expresses this law for three coplanar concurrent forces?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The triangle law of forces is a graphical equilibrium criterion for three concurrent coplanar forces. It is widely used in statics for quick solution of simple trusses, joints, and ring-connector problems when only three forces act at a point. Given Data / Assumptions: Three forces are coplanar and concurrent (acting at a single point). Forces are represented by directed line segments to scale. Static equilibrium (resultant equals zero). Concept / Approach: When three forces keep a point in equilibrium, they can be arranged head-to-tail to form a closed triangle. The closure of the polygon of forces is a geometric manifestation of zero resultant. The law is a special case of the polygon of forces and is consistent with Lami’s theorem for three-force equilibrium. Step-by-Step Solution: Represent force F1 as a vector segment; from its head draw F2 to scale and direction.From the head of F2, draw F3 so that it closes the triangle back to the tail of F1.Closed triangle (no gap) ⇒ vector sum F1 + F2 + F3 = 0 ⇒ equilibrium. Verification / Alternative check: Lami’s theorem states F1 / sin(α) = F2 / sin(β) = F3 / sin(γ) for the angles opposite the respective forces, which is equivalent to the triangle construction in equilibrium. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: Forces along the sides of a triangle are not necessarily concurrent or in equilibrium. C: This is Lami’s theorem phrasing but incomplete without angle context; option A captures the triangle-law definition directly. D: This is the triangle law of addition for two forces (resultant), not a three-force equilibrium statement. E: Orthogonality is not required for equilibrium of three forces. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting force concurrency; mixing the triangle law of forces (equilibrium) with the triangle law of vector addition (resultant of two forces). Final Answer: If three forces acting at a point can be represented in magnitude and direction by the sides of a triangle taken in order, the forces are in equilibrium

Question 16

Uniformly accelerated motion (retardation case): A particle starts with speed u = 2 m/s along a straight line and experiences a constant negative acceleration a = −0.1 m/s^2. How much time t is required to traverse a distance S = 1.5 m from the star…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Translational kinematics with constant acceleration allows direct computation of travel time when the initial velocity, uniform acceleration (including deceleration), and displacement are known. Care must be taken with signs and with multiple mathematical roots of the quadratic equation. Given Data / Assumptions: Initial speed u = 2 m/s. Constant acceleration a = −0.1 m/s^2 (retardation). Required displacement S = 1.5 m in the initial direction. Straight-line motion; no turning points considered within the shortest travel time. Concept / Approach: Use the displacement relation for constant acceleration: S = u * t + (1/2) * a * t^2. This yields a quadratic in t. The physically meaningful time is the smaller positive root (the later larger root corresponds to a mathematically valid but physically subsequent position after slowing, stopping, and reversing if applicable). Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Write S = u t + 0.5 a t^2 → 1.5 = 2 t + 0.5 * (−0.1) * t^2.2) Rearranged: 0.05 t^2 − 2 t + 1.5 = 0.3) Discriminant D = (−2)^2 − 4 * 0.05 * 1.5 = 4 − 0.3 = 3.7.4) t = [2 ± √3.7] / (2 * 0.05) = [2 ± 1.9235] / 0.1.5) t1 ≈ 0.0765 / 0.1 ≈ 0.765 s; t2 ≈ 3.9235 / 0.1 ≈ 39.24 s.6) The relevant (shortest) time is t ≈ 0.76 s. Verification / Alternative check: Compute velocity at t = 0.765 s: v = u + a t ≈ 2 − 0.1 * 0.765 ≈ 1.9235 m/s (still positive), confirming the first passage before the particle meaningfully slows down. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Values like 10–20 s are far beyond the first physical crossing; 1.50 s is a distractor from using S ≈ u t only (ignoring acceleration). Common Pitfalls: Dropping the acceleration term; selecting the larger quadratic root without interpreting motion; sign mistakes with negative acceleration. Final Answer: t ≈ 0.76 s

Question 17

Newton’s law for collision of perfectly elastic bodies: The velocity of separation of the colliding bodies is related to their velocity of approach by which statement?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Collisions in one dimension are characterized by conservation laws and an impact law. Newton’s law of restitution introduces the coefficient of restitution e (0 ≤ e ≤ 1) connecting the relative speeds before and after impact. For perfectly elastic impacts, e = 1. Given Data / Assumptions: Smooth, central impact (line of centers collinear with motion). Short impact duration; external impulses along line of motion negligible. Perfect elasticity implies no kinetic energy loss along line of impact. Concept / Approach: Define relative speed of approach as (u1 − u2) along the line of centers before impact, and relative speed of separation as (v2 − v1) after impact (signs chosen consistently). Newton’s impact law states: (velocity of separation) = e * (velocity of approach). With e = 1 for perfectly elastic collisions. Step-by-Step Solution: Write restitution relation: v2 − v1 = e (u1 − u2).For e = 1, v2 − v1 = u1 − u2.Combine with momentum conservation to solve for unknown velocities if needed. Verification / Alternative check: For equal masses in a head-on elastic collision, the bodies exchange velocities, which satisfies e = 1 and momentum conservation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Direct or inverse proportionality without a defined constant is incomplete; the law specifies a constant ratio e (option C). Sum/difference formulations do not represent the restitution law. Common Pitfalls: Confusing absolute with relative velocities; mixing sign conventions; applying restitution off the line of centers in oblique impact without resolving components. Final Answer: Velocity of separation bears a constant ratio to velocity of approach (the coefficient of restitution)

Question 18

Units check (geometric vs mass moment): The moment of inertia of an area (second moment of area) has which SI units?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Two commonly confused quantities are the geometric (second) moment of area and the mass moment of inertia. Both are called “moment of inertia” in practice, but they have different dimensions and applications. The geometric moment of area measures resistance to bending (beam theory), while the mass moment of inertia measures resistance to angular acceleration (dynamics). Given Data / Assumptions: We are asked specifically about the moment of inertia of an area, not of mass. Standard SI base units are to be used. Concept / Approach: The second moment of area I for a plane area A relative to an axis is defined by an integral of the form I = ∫ y^2 dA (or ∫ r^2 dA), where y (or r) is a length. Since dA has units of m^2 and y^2 has units of m^2, the product yields m^4. Conversely, mass moment of inertia involves ∫ r^2 dm and hence has units kg·m^2. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the requested property: second moment of area.Use definition I = ∫ y^2 dA → units: (m^2) * (m^2) = m^4.Therefore the correct SI units are m^4. Verification / Alternative check: Dimensional analysis of standard formulas, e.g., rectangular section about centroidal axis: I = b h^3 / 12 has units (m) * (m^3) = m^4, confirming the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: m^3 and kg/m^2: Not consistent with ∫ y^2 dA. kg·m^2: Units of mass moment of inertia, not area moment. N·m^2: Units of torque times length, irrelevant here. Common Pitfalls: Confusing geometric with mass moment; forgetting that area moment of inertia is purely geometric and independent of material density. Final Answer: m^4

Question 19

Head-on elastic collision on a smooth table: Ball A (mass = 250 g) moves at 10 m/s and strikes an identical stationary ball B. If the impact is perfectly elastic, what is the speed of ball B immediately after impact?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Elastic impacts between identical masses are a standard application of conservation of linear momentum combined with the coefficient of restitution e. For perfectly elastic collisions (e = 1), kinetic energy along the line of impact is conserved, and the bodies exchange velocities in a head-on collision. Given Data / Assumptions: m_A = m_B = 0.25 kg. u_A = 10 m/s; u_B = 0 m/s. Smooth horizontal table; central (head-on) impact; e = 1. Concept / Approach: For central elastic impact of equal masses, post-impact velocities swap: the moving mass stops and the stationary mass departs with the initial speed of the moving mass. This can be shown from momentum conservation and restitution. Step-by-Step Solution: Momentum: m u_A + m u_B = m v_A + m v_B → 10 m = v_A + v_B.Restitution: v_B − v_A = e (u_A − u_B) = 1 * 10 = 10.Solve simultaneously: add equations → 2 v_B = 20 → v_B = 10 m/s; then v_A = 0. Verification / Alternative check: Kinetic energy check: Initial KE = (1/2) m (10)^2; final KE = (1/2) m (10)^2 (all carried by B). Energy is preserved along the line of impact as expected for e = 1. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0 m/s or 5 m/s contradict the conservation-plus-restitution solution; higher speeds like 15 or 20 m/s would require energy input, impossible here. Common Pitfalls: Neglecting the restitution equation; confusing equal-mass elastic collisions with inelastic cases where speeds do not exchange perfectly. Final Answer: 10 m/s

Question 20

Kinematics refresher (straight-line motion): Which of the following are the standard constant-acceleration equations connecting displacement S, initial velocity u, final velocity v, acceleration a, and time t?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: For motion along a straight line with constant acceleration, three core equations relate velocity, displacement, time, and acceleration. They are cornerstones in solving a wide range of problems from vehicle braking to projectile components and industrial automation timing. Given Data / Assumptions: Acceleration a is constant in magnitude and direction. Variables: initial velocity u, final velocity v, displacement S, time t. Straight-line motion; vector signs handled consistently. Concept / Approach: These equations are derived by integrating a = dv/dt, using v = ds/dt, and applying limits from initial to final states. Because a is constant, the integrals yield closed-form algebraic relations that avoid calculus during routine problem solving. Step-by-Step Solution: From a = dv/dt (constant), integrate: v = u + a t.Average velocity for constant a is (u + v)/2; therefore S = ((u + v)/2) * t.Eliminate v using v = u + a t to obtain S = u t + (1/2) a t^2.Eliminate t from v = u + a t and S = u t + (1/2) a t^2 to get v^2 − u^2 = 2 a S. Verification / Alternative check: Dimensional consistency: a t has velocity units; a t^2 has length units; the relation v^2 − u^2 = 2 a S has dimensions of velocity squared on both sides. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each of A, B, and C is correct individually; thus “All of the above” is the comprehensive choice. “None” is inapplicable. Common Pitfalls: Using these equations when acceleration is not constant; mishandling signs when motion reverses direction during the time interval. Final Answer: All of the above

Applied Mechanics Questions