Choice of distribution network pattern for irregular towns: For a city developed haphazardly with many dead-ends and irregular street patterns, which pipe layout is generally adopted?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Dead end system

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Water distribution layout must conform to urban morphology. Regular, planned towns favor looped or grid systems that provide redundancy and balanced pressures. In contrast, organically grown or haphazard cities often lack continuous loops, leading to branch-like terminal lines, i.e., dead ends. Recognizing the appropriate layout helps in realistic hydraulic modeling and valve placement.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Street network is irregular, with many cul-de-sacs and discontinuous links.
  • Limited right-of-way or budget to retrofit full loops.
  • Objective is a feasible initial layout rather than the theoretically ideal one.


Concept / Approach:
Dead end (tree) systems branch from trunk mains to sub-mains and service connections, terminating without forming loops. They are straightforward to build where streets do not form closed blocks. However, they suffer from stagnation and poor redundancy, thus require blowoffs and careful valve placement. In planned upgrades, conversion toward grid or ring systems is desirable.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess urban pattern: irregular and non-rectilinear.Match to feasible hydraulic layout: dead end (branch) system.Select the option “Dead end system.”


Verification / Alternative check:
Standard texts and municipal practice consistently associate haphazard urban fabric with tree/dead-end layouts, later retrofitted with interconnections where possible to improve fire flows and reliability.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Grid iron/ring: require planned, interconnected streets.
  • Radial: suits cities with a central storage feeding radial mains.
  • Hybrid: while practically used, the question asks the generally adopted pattern for such towns; the canonical answer is dead end.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Assuming dead-end systems are acceptable without flushing; water quality can degrade in terminal lines.
  • Overlooking the need for future looping to improve resilience.


Final Answer:
Dead end system

More Questions from Water Supply Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion