Q: The weakest sound that an average human can hear (reference threshold of hearing) is approximately 0 dB at 1 kHz in a quiet environment.

Introduction / Context: Decibel (dB) is a logarithmic unit used to express sound pressure level (SPL). By convention, the reference threshold of hearing for an average young adult in a very quiet environment at 1 kHz is set to 0 dB SPL, not zero sound but a standardized reference level. Given Data / Assumptions: Quiet environment, normal hearing, 1 kHz reference frequency. We are interested in the conventional threshold used in acoustics. Concept / Approach: dB SPL = 20 * log10(p/p0), where p0 is the reference pressure 20 µPa. A level of 0 dB SPL means p = p0, i.e., the threshold reference. Real thresholds vary slightly with frequency and individuals but 0 dB at 1 kHz is the standard baseline. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize that 0 dB SPL is a defined reference corresponding to 20 µPa.2) Understand that values above 0 dB indicate sound pressures higher than the threshold.3) Select 0 dB as the conventional weakest audible level for normal hearing at 1 kHz. Verification / Alternative check: Audiometric curves (equal-loudness contours) show minimal threshold near 2–5 kHz with reference near 0 dB SPL at 1 kHz; testing rooms aim for very low background noise to approach this threshold. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5 dB / 10 dB / 20 dB / 30 dB: represent louder sounds than the threshold reference; may be perceived in noisier environments or by individuals with slightly higher thresholds but are not the defined baseline. Common Pitfalls: Assuming 0 dB means no sound; forgetting that dB is logarithmic and relative to a reference pressure. Final Answer: 0 dB

Q: In a slow sand filter, the usual water filtration rate is about 100 to 200 litres per square metre per hour (≈0.1–0.2 m/h).

Introduction / Context: Slow sand filters (SSF) achieve excellent microbiological removal at very low filtration rates thanks to biological processes within the schmutzdecke (biologically active layer). Given Data / Assumptions: SSF are not backwashed; cleaning is by scraping the top sand layer. Rates are an order of magnitude lower than rapid sand filters. Concept / Approach: Design guidance places SSF around 0.1–0.2 m/h, which equals 100–200 L/m2/hr. This supports biologically mediated removal while maintaining effluent quality. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize that SSF emphasize biological action; high rates would disrupt performance.2) Convert 0.1–0.2 m/h to L/m2/hr: 1 m/h = 1000 L/m2/hr; thus 0.1–0.2 m/h = 100–200 L/m2/hr.3) Choose the option matching this standard range. Verification / Alternative check: Historical SSF designs and WHO guidance cite similar ranges and operational practices. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 10–20: too low; impractically small throughput.1500–2500 or 4000–5000: far too high; these are rapid filtration/pressure filter regimes.600–900: still high for SSF; risks breakthrough. Common Pitfalls: Confusing SSF with RSF; forgetting unit conversions; assuming higher rate is always better. Final Answer: 100 to 200 L/m2/hr

Q: Nitrogen acts as a simple asphyxiant by displacing oxygen; when nitrogen in contaminated air rises to about 84 percent or more, oxygen falls to 16 percent or less, causing asphyxia risk.

Introduction / Context: In confined or contaminated atmospheres, inert gases like nitrogen can displace oxygen without providing warning signs (no odor, no irritation). Such gases are termed simple asphyxiants. The principal hazard is reduction of the partial pressure of oxygen in the lungs, leading to hypoxia and potentially rapid loss of consciousness. Given Data / Assumptions: Normal dry air contains ~78 percent nitrogen and ~21 percent oxygen. Asphyxia risk escalates as oxygen drops below about 19.5 percent (commonly used safety threshold), with severe symptoms as it approaches ~16 percent and below. Concept / Approach: As nitrogen concentration increases, oxygen decreases proportionally. If nitrogen is 84 percent, oxygen is roughly 16 percent, which is within a dangerous range for workers and bystanders, especially under exertion. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Start from normal composition: N2 ~78 percent, O2 ~21 percent.2) Consider displacement: raising N2 to 84 percent lowers O2 to ~16 percent.3) Recognize that ~16 percent O2 is hazardous and can produce asphyxial symptoms. Verification / Alternative check: Safety standards flag atmospheres with O2 < 19.5 percent as oxygen-deficient. Many incident reports involve inert gas purging or leaks that push O2 near 16 percent or less, rapidly incapacitating entrants. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 80 percent: O2 ~20 percent; typically above deficiency threshold.88 percent / 92 percent / 96 percent: represent even lower O2 but the prompt asks for the level at which it acts as a natural asphyxiant; 84 percent is the accepted indicative threshold tied to ~16 percent O2. Common Pitfalls: Assuming symptoms occur only at very low oxygen levels; ignoring rapid onset and lack of warning properties; entering confined spaces without testing. Final Answer: 84 percent

Q: Drinking-water (potable water) quality standard: What should be the acceptable pH range for safe human consumption according to common water-quality guidelines (municipal supply and treated groundwater)?

Introduction: Drinking water should neither be strongly acidic nor strongly alkaline. The pH window ensures palatability, corrosion control in the network, and effectiveness of disinfection. Given Data / Assumptions: Context: Potable water standard. We seek the acceptable pH range that balances health and system protection. Room temperature conditions assumed. Concept / Approach: pH measures hydrogen ion activity on a 0 to 14 scale. Neutral is pH 7. Acceptable potable water is typically slightly acidic to slightly alkaline to prevent corrosion and scaling while maintaining taste and disinfectant stability. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that neutral water is pH 7.Step 2: Practical distribution systems target a slightly buffered range around neutrality.Step 3: The commonly accepted range for potable water is about 6.5 to 8.0 (often cited up to 8.5). Verification / Alternative check: At pH below 6.5, corrosion of pipes increases; above about 8.0 to 8.5, taste issues and scaling rise and chlorine disinfection becomes less effective. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1.0 to 1.5: Extremely acidic and unsafe. 13.0 to 14.0: Highly caustic. 4.0 to 5.0 and 5.5 to 6.0: Corrosion risk and poor taste; not acceptable for distribution. Common Pitfalls: Assuming pH must be exactly 7.0. Water can be safe within a reasonable range around neutrality. Final Answer: 6.5 to 8.0

Q: Treated drinking water: What is the maximum permissible free residual chlorine at the consumer end (after typical contact time), expressed in mg/L?

Introduction: Residual chlorine ensures continuing disinfection in the distribution system. Too little leaves water vulnerable; too much affects taste and safety. Given Data / Assumptions: Treated water, post contact (about 30 minutes). Consumer end residual target in mg/L. Normal municipal distribution conditions. Concept / Approach: Disinfection uses chlorine dose, demand, and contact time. A small but effective residual must remain when water reaches consumers to control regrowth. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Typical guideline residual at consumer tap is roughly 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L.Step 2: Many standards operationalize a narrower band near 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L to balance safety and taste.Step 3: Hence, the maximum permissible value in this context aligns with 0.3 mg/L upper bound. Verification / Alternative check: Higher values (2 to 3 mg/L, 5 to 10 mg/L) cause strong odor/taste and are generally beyond routine potable practice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.001–0.01: Ineffective. 2–3 and 5–10: Excessively high. 0.05–0.1: Often insufficient to guarantee residual at the far end. Common Pitfalls: Confusing applied chlorine dose with residual; they are not the same. Final Answer: 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L

Q: Water disinfection for preventing water-borne diseases: Which of the following agents or methods are valid for destroying pathogenic bacteria in potable water?

Introduction: Effective disinfection removes or inactivates disease-causing microorganisms in water. Multiple technologies can achieve this, each with strengths and limitations. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal: Destroy pathogenic bacteria. Typical municipal treatment context. Common disinfectants considered: chlorine, ozone/iodine, and UV. Concept / Approach: Disinfection works via chemical oxidation (chlorine, ozone, iodine) or physical mechanisms (UV damaging microbial DNA). Selection depends on source water quality, cost, and residual needs. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Chlorine is widely used, effective, and provides a residual.Step 2: Ozone is a powerful oxidant yielding rapid inactivation but no lasting residual.Step 3: UV irradiation inactivates microorganisms physically and avoids chemical taste.Step 4: Therefore, all three can be valid disinfection methods. Verification / Alternative check: Many treatment trains combine these methods, e.g., UV or ozone primary, chlorine for residual. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Single-method statements exclude other proven methods; boiling is effective in emergencies but is not the only valid engineered method. Common Pitfalls: Assuming residual is required from the primary step; UV and ozone may be followed by low-dose chlorine to maintain residual. Final Answer: All of the above

Q: Identify the inorganic impurity category among the following common pollutants found in contaminated water.

Introduction: Water pollution contains both organic and inorganic components. Distinguishing these classes helps select appropriate treatment processes. Given Data / Assumptions: We compare typical pollutant classes. Focus is on identifying an inorganic impurity. General environmental engineering context. Concept / Approach: Organic compounds contain carbon-hydrogen frameworks (e.g., fats, carbohydrates, proteins). Inorganics include minerals, salts, and metals that do not fit typical organic structures. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Classify each option as organic or inorganic.Step 2: Fats, carbohydrates, and proteins are organic.Step 3: Salts of metals are inorganic species.Step 4: Therefore, salts of metals are the inorganic impurities. Verification / Alternative check: Common inorganic ions include chlorides, sulfates, nitrates, and metal cations, all requiring different treatment than organics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fats, carbohydrates, proteins, and natural oils are carbon-based organics and do not represent inorganic impurities. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “natural” equals “inorganic.” Many natural substances are organic. Final Answer: Salts of metals

Q: Industrial hygiene: What is a representative threshold limit value (TLV) order of magnitude in parts per million for compounds such as ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, or phenol vapor in workplace air?

Introduction: Threshold limit values (TLVs) guide acceptable airborne concentrations for occupational exposure. Different compounds have different TLVs, but their order of magnitude informs risk controls. Given Data / Assumptions: We seek a representative order-of-magnitude value. Compounds cited: ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, phenol vapor. Standard 8-hour workplace exposure context. Concept / Approach: TLVs are substance-specific. Phenol commonly has a low TLV near a few ppm. Nitrogen dioxide has low ppm or sub-ppm guidance. Ammonia TLV is higher but still far below thousands of ppm for routine exposure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compare typical TLVs: phenol low single-digit ppm; NO2 around sub-ppm to low ppm; ammonia tens of ppm.Step 2: The safest representative order-of-magnitude among the choices that applies to at least one cited chemical is single-digit ppm.Step 3: Therefore, 5 ppm best represents a conservative TLV magnitude in the set provided. Verification / Alternative check: Values like 1000 or 2000 ppm are immediately irritating or dangerous for many compounds and do not reflect TLVs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 100 ppm: too high for NO2 and phenol. 1000 and 2000 ppm: unrealistic TLVs. 0.05 ppm: too low as a general representative for the listed set. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single TLV applies to all chemicals; always consult substance-specific tables. Final Answer: 5 ppm

Q: Aircraft cabin acoustics: Approximately what is the noise level inside a jet airliner during normal cruise flight, expressed in decibels (dB)?

Introduction: Noise exposure affects comfort and communication. Jet cabins have characteristic sound levels due to engines, airflow, and structure-borne noise. Given Data / Assumptions: Normal cruise conditions. Modern jet airliner cabin. Sound pressure level in dB. Concept / Approach: dB is a logarithmic scale. Cabin noise typically falls in the high 70s to mid 80s dB in cruise, varying by aircraft type and seat location. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify a typical cabin range of about 78 to 85 dB.Step 2: The representative choice within that band is 80 dB.Step 3: Higher options such as 125 or 145 dB indicate extreme levels not present in normal cabins. Verification / Alternative check: Cabin measurements in literature commonly report ~80 dB during cruise. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 100 dB: higher than typical cabin average. 125 and 145 dB: hazardous and unrealistic for cruise. 60 dB: too quiet for jet cruise. Common Pitfalls: Confusing takeoff or seat near engines with average cabin levels; cruise is quieter than takeoff. Final Answer: 80 dB

Question 1

Identify the incorrect statement regarding BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand) as a water quality parameter.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) indicates the amount of dissolved oxygen that aerobic microorganisms require to oxidize biodegradable organic matter in water over a specified period (commonly 5 days at 20°C, termed BOD5). It is a key indicator of organic pollution and treatment performance. Given Data / Assumptions: Options include statements about the definition, units, and typical magnitude of BOD. Potable (drinking) water is expected to have very low BOD. Concept / Approach: Evaluate each statement against standard definitions and typical values. The incorrect one will contradict accepted ranges for drinking water quality. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Option A: Correct—BOD is a measured characteristic, not a substance.2) Option B: Correct—BOD5 is oxygen demanded by microbial decomposition over 5 days at 20°C.3) Option D: Correct—BOD is expressed in mg/L.4) Option C: Incorrect—BOD for potable water is typically < 1 mg/L (often near zero). 2.5 mg/L is high for drinking water and indicates contamination. Verification / Alternative check: Regulatory guidance and design manuals consistently place potable water BOD very low; secondary effluent may be around 20 mg/L, raw sewage 150–300 mg/L, underscoring the scale difference. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Matches definition of a water quality parameter.B: Accurately describes BOD5 procedure conceptually.D: Correct unit convention.E: Invalid because we have identified one incorrect statement (C). Common Pitfalls: Confusing BOD with COD; thinking BOD is a substance that can be filtered out; assuming drinking water may have multi-mg/L BOD. Final Answer: Typical BOD for potable water is about 2.5 mg/L.

Question 2

The weakest sound that an average human can hear (reference threshold of hearing) is approximately 0 dB at 1 kHz in a quiet environment.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Decibel (dB) is a logarithmic unit used to express sound pressure level (SPL). By convention, the reference threshold of hearing for an average young adult in a very quiet environment at 1 kHz is set to 0 dB SPL, not zero sound but a standardized reference level. Given Data / Assumptions: Quiet environment, normal hearing, 1 kHz reference frequency. We are interested in the conventional threshold used in acoustics. Concept / Approach: dB SPL = 20 * log10(p/p0), where p0 is the reference pressure 20 µPa. A level of 0 dB SPL means p = p0, i.e., the threshold reference. Real thresholds vary slightly with frequency and individuals but 0 dB at 1 kHz is the standard baseline. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize that 0 dB SPL is a defined reference corresponding to 20 µPa.2) Understand that values above 0 dB indicate sound pressures higher than the threshold.3) Select 0 dB as the conventional weakest audible level for normal hearing at 1 kHz. Verification / Alternative check: Audiometric curves (equal-loudness contours) show minimal threshold near 2–5 kHz with reference near 0 dB SPL at 1 kHz; testing rooms aim for very low background noise to approach this threshold. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5 dB / 10 dB / 20 dB / 30 dB: represent louder sounds than the threshold reference; may be perceived in noisier environments or by individuals with slightly higher thresholds but are not the defined baseline. Common Pitfalls: Assuming 0 dB means no sound; forgetting that dB is logarithmic and relative to a reference pressure. Final Answer: 0 dB

Question 3

In a slow sand filter, the usual water filtration rate is about 100 to 200 litres per square metre per hour (≈0.1–0.2 m/h).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Slow sand filters (SSF) achieve excellent microbiological removal at very low filtration rates thanks to biological processes within the schmutzdecke (biologically active layer). Given Data / Assumptions: SSF are not backwashed; cleaning is by scraping the top sand layer. Rates are an order of magnitude lower than rapid sand filters. Concept / Approach: Design guidance places SSF around 0.1–0.2 m/h, which equals 100–200 L/m2/hr. This supports biologically mediated removal while maintaining effluent quality. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize that SSF emphasize biological action; high rates would disrupt performance.2) Convert 0.1–0.2 m/h to L/m2/hr: 1 m/h = 1000 L/m2/hr; thus 0.1–0.2 m/h = 100–200 L/m2/hr.3) Choose the option matching this standard range. Verification / Alternative check: Historical SSF designs and WHO guidance cite similar ranges and operational practices. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 10–20: too low; impractically small throughput.1500–2500 or 4000–5000: far too high; these are rapid filtration/pressure filter regimes.600–900: still high for SSF; risks breakthrough. Common Pitfalls: Confusing SSF with RSF; forgetting unit conversions; assuming higher rate is always better. Final Answer: 100 to 200 L/m2/hr

Question 4

Nitrogen acts as a simple asphyxiant by displacing oxygen; when nitrogen in contaminated air rises to about 84 percent or more, oxygen falls to 16 percent or less, causing asphyxia risk.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In confined or contaminated atmospheres, inert gases like nitrogen can displace oxygen without providing warning signs (no odor, no irritation). Such gases are termed simple asphyxiants. The principal hazard is reduction of the partial pressure of oxygen in the lungs, leading to hypoxia and potentially rapid loss of consciousness. Given Data / Assumptions: Normal dry air contains ~78 percent nitrogen and ~21 percent oxygen. Asphyxia risk escalates as oxygen drops below about 19.5 percent (commonly used safety threshold), with severe symptoms as it approaches ~16 percent and below. Concept / Approach: As nitrogen concentration increases, oxygen decreases proportionally. If nitrogen is 84 percent, oxygen is roughly 16 percent, which is within a dangerous range for workers and bystanders, especially under exertion. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Start from normal composition: N2 ~78 percent, O2 ~21 percent.2) Consider displacement: raising N2 to 84 percent lowers O2 to ~16 percent.3) Recognize that ~16 percent O2 is hazardous and can produce asphyxial symptoms. Verification / Alternative check: Safety standards flag atmospheres with O2 < 19.5 percent as oxygen-deficient. Many incident reports involve inert gas purging or leaks that push O2 near 16 percent or less, rapidly incapacitating entrants. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 80 percent: O2 ~20 percent; typically above deficiency threshold.88 percent / 92 percent / 96 percent: represent even lower O2 but the prompt asks for the level at which it acts as a natural asphyxiant; 84 percent is the accepted indicative threshold tied to ~16 percent O2. Common Pitfalls: Assuming symptoms occur only at very low oxygen levels; ignoring rapid onset and lack of warning properties; entering confined spaces without testing. Final Answer: 84 percent

Question 5

Drinking-water (potable water) quality standard: What should be the acceptable pH range for safe human consumption according to common water-quality guidelines (municipal supply and treated groundwater)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Drinking water should neither be strongly acidic nor strongly alkaline. The pH window ensures palatability, corrosion control in the network, and effectiveness of disinfection. Given Data / Assumptions: Context: Potable water standard. We seek the acceptable pH range that balances health and system protection. Room temperature conditions assumed. Concept / Approach: pH measures hydrogen ion activity on a 0 to 14 scale. Neutral is pH 7. Acceptable potable water is typically slightly acidic to slightly alkaline to prevent corrosion and scaling while maintaining taste and disinfectant stability. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that neutral water is pH 7.Step 2: Practical distribution systems target a slightly buffered range around neutrality.Step 3: The commonly accepted range for potable water is about 6.5 to 8.0 (often cited up to 8.5). Verification / Alternative check: At pH below 6.5, corrosion of pipes increases; above about 8.0 to 8.5, taste issues and scaling rise and chlorine disinfection becomes less effective. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1.0 to 1.5: Extremely acidic and unsafe. 13.0 to 14.0: Highly caustic. 4.0 to 5.0 and 5.5 to 6.0: Corrosion risk and poor taste; not acceptable for distribution. Common Pitfalls: Assuming pH must be exactly 7.0. Water can be safe within a reasonable range around neutrality. Final Answer: 6.5 to 8.0

Question 6

Treated drinking water: What is the maximum permissible free residual chlorine at the consumer end (after typical contact time), expressed in mg/L?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Residual chlorine ensures continuing disinfection in the distribution system. Too little leaves water vulnerable; too much affects taste and safety. Given Data / Assumptions: Treated water, post contact (about 30 minutes). Consumer end residual target in mg/L. Normal municipal distribution conditions. Concept / Approach: Disinfection uses chlorine dose, demand, and contact time. A small but effective residual must remain when water reaches consumers to control regrowth. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Typical guideline residual at consumer tap is roughly 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L.Step 2: Many standards operationalize a narrower band near 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L to balance safety and taste.Step 3: Hence, the maximum permissible value in this context aligns with 0.3 mg/L upper bound. Verification / Alternative check: Higher values (2 to 3 mg/L, 5 to 10 mg/L) cause strong odor/taste and are generally beyond routine potable practice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.001–0.01: Ineffective. 2–3 and 5–10: Excessively high. 0.05–0.1: Often insufficient to guarantee residual at the far end. Common Pitfalls: Confusing applied chlorine dose with residual; they are not the same. Final Answer: 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L

Question 7

Water disinfection for preventing water-borne diseases: Which of the following agents or methods are valid for destroying pathogenic bacteria in potable water?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Effective disinfection removes or inactivates disease-causing microorganisms in water. Multiple technologies can achieve this, each with strengths and limitations. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal: Destroy pathogenic bacteria. Typical municipal treatment context. Common disinfectants considered: chlorine, ozone/iodine, and UV. Concept / Approach: Disinfection works via chemical oxidation (chlorine, ozone, iodine) or physical mechanisms (UV damaging microbial DNA). Selection depends on source water quality, cost, and residual needs. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Chlorine is widely used, effective, and provides a residual.Step 2: Ozone is a powerful oxidant yielding rapid inactivation but no lasting residual.Step 3: UV irradiation inactivates microorganisms physically and avoids chemical taste.Step 4: Therefore, all three can be valid disinfection methods. Verification / Alternative check: Many treatment trains combine these methods, e.g., UV or ozone primary, chlorine for residual. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Single-method statements exclude other proven methods; boiling is effective in emergencies but is not the only valid engineered method. Common Pitfalls: Assuming residual is required from the primary step; UV and ozone may be followed by low-dose chlorine to maintain residual. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 8

Identify the inorganic impurity category among the following common pollutants found in contaminated water.

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Water pollution contains both organic and inorganic components. Distinguishing these classes helps select appropriate treatment processes. Given Data / Assumptions: We compare typical pollutant classes. Focus is on identifying an inorganic impurity. General environmental engineering context. Concept / Approach: Organic compounds contain carbon-hydrogen frameworks (e.g., fats, carbohydrates, proteins). Inorganics include minerals, salts, and metals that do not fit typical organic structures. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Classify each option as organic or inorganic.Step 2: Fats, carbohydrates, and proteins are organic.Step 3: Salts of metals are inorganic species.Step 4: Therefore, salts of metals are the inorganic impurities. Verification / Alternative check: Common inorganic ions include chlorides, sulfates, nitrates, and metal cations, all requiring different treatment than organics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fats, carbohydrates, proteins, and natural oils are carbon-based organics and do not represent inorganic impurities. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “natural” equals “inorganic.” Many natural substances are organic. Final Answer: Salts of metals

Question 9

Industrial hygiene: What is a representative threshold limit value (TLV) order of magnitude in parts per million for compounds such as ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, or phenol vapor in workplace air?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Threshold limit values (TLVs) guide acceptable airborne concentrations for occupational exposure. Different compounds have different TLVs, but their order of magnitude informs risk controls. Given Data / Assumptions: We seek a representative order-of-magnitude value. Compounds cited: ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, phenol vapor. Standard 8-hour workplace exposure context. Concept / Approach: TLVs are substance-specific. Phenol commonly has a low TLV near a few ppm. Nitrogen dioxide has low ppm or sub-ppm guidance. Ammonia TLV is higher but still far below thousands of ppm for routine exposure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compare typical TLVs: phenol low single-digit ppm; NO2 around sub-ppm to low ppm; ammonia tens of ppm.Step 2: The safest representative order-of-magnitude among the choices that applies to at least one cited chemical is single-digit ppm.Step 3: Therefore, 5 ppm best represents a conservative TLV magnitude in the set provided. Verification / Alternative check: Values like 1000 or 2000 ppm are immediately irritating or dangerous for many compounds and do not reflect TLVs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 100 ppm: too high for NO2 and phenol. 1000 and 2000 ppm: unrealistic TLVs. 0.05 ppm: too low as a general representative for the listed set. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single TLV applies to all chemicals; always consult substance-specific tables. Final Answer: 5 ppm

Question 10

Aircraft cabin acoustics: Approximately what is the noise level inside a jet airliner during normal cruise flight, expressed in decibels (dB)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Noise exposure affects comfort and communication. Jet cabins have characteristic sound levels due to engines, airflow, and structure-borne noise. Given Data / Assumptions: Normal cruise conditions. Modern jet airliner cabin. Sound pressure level in dB. Concept / Approach: dB is a logarithmic scale. Cabin noise typically falls in the high 70s to mid 80s dB in cruise, varying by aircraft type and seat location. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify a typical cabin range of about 78 to 85 dB.Step 2: The representative choice within that band is 80 dB.Step 3: Higher options such as 125 or 145 dB indicate extreme levels not present in normal cabins. Verification / Alternative check: Cabin measurements in literature commonly report ~80 dB during cruise. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 100 dB: higher than typical cabin average. 125 and 145 dB: hazardous and unrealistic for cruise. 60 dB: too quiet for jet cruise. Common Pitfalls: Confusing takeoff or seat near engines with average cabin levels; cruise is quieter than takeoff. Final Answer: 80 dB

Question 11

Pure distilled water at 25°C: What is the hydrogen ion concentration [H+] in mol/L under neutral conditions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Neutral water has equal hydrogen and hydroxide ion concentrations. At standard temperature, this defines the pH scale midpoint. Given Data / Assumptions: Distilled water, 25°C assumed. Neutral condition (pH 7). Units in mol/L. Concept / Approach: At 25°C, water autoionization constant Kw = [H+] * [OH-] = 1e-14. Neutrality implies [H+] = [OH-] = sqrt(1e-14) = 1e-7 mol/L. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Use Kw = 1e-14 at 25°C.Step 2: For neutral water, [H+] = [OH-].Step 3: [H+] = sqrt(1e-14) = 1e-7 mol/L. Verification / Alternative check: pH = -log10([H+]) = 7 confirms neutrality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 7e-7 overstates [H+]; 1e7 and 7e7 are impossible; 1e-5 corresponds to pH 5 (acidic), not neutral. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting that Kw changes with temperature; at 25°C it is 1e-14. Final Answer: 1e-7 mol/L

Question 12

Air pollution impacts: What are the principal environmental and health effects associated with sulphur dioxide (SO2) in industrial stack emissions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: SO2 is a key regulated pollutant from combustion of sulfur-containing fuels. It affects human health, vegetation, and infrastructure. Given Data / Assumptions: Industrial chimney exhaust containing SO2. Ambient exposure scenarios. Typical concentrations of concern in pollution control. Concept / Approach: SO2 irritates respiratory pathways, can form acid rain via oxidation to sulfuric acid, and corrodes materials including metals, concrete, and historical monuments. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Health: SO2 aggravates asthma and reduces lung function.Step 2: Vegetation: Acid deposition damages leaves and soils, lowering productivity.Step 3: Materials: Acidic species corrode metals and stone. Verification / Alternative check: Air quality standards include SO2 limits to protect public health and ecosystems. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Single-effect options ignore the documented multi-domain impacts; claiming no effect is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Assuming SO2 impact is limited to smell; secondary formation (acid rain, sulfates) broadens damage. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 13

Phosphatic fertilizer manufacturing: Which constituent of phosphate rock is the primary pollutant of concern due to emissions released during processing?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Processing phosphate rock can release gaseous pollutants. Identifying the key contaminant helps target emission control systems. Given Data / Assumptions: Phosphatic fertilizer plant using phosphate rock. Looking for the pollutant of primary interest. Typical wet-process phosphoric acid or superphosphate context. Concept / Approach: Phosphate rock frequently contains fluorine. During acidulation, volatile fluorine compounds such as HF and SiF4 can be emitted unless scrubbed. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognize fluorine content in many phosphate ores.Step 2: Acid treatment liberates fluoride gases.Step 3: Therefore, fluorine compounds are the primary pollutant concern. Verification / Alternative check: Plants install wet scrubbers to capture fluoride emissions and protect workers and nearby communities. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Calcium and phosphorus are product-related, not the main emitted pollutants; sulfur and silica behave differently and are not the chief gaseous emissions of concern here. Common Pitfalls: Assuming phosphorus itself is the key air pollutant; it is largely retained in the product stream. Final Answer: Fluorine

Question 14

Sewage treatment process selection: In an Imhoff tank, what treatment actions occur to raw sewage during operation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: An Imhoff tank is a two-story unit used in primary wastewater treatment. Understanding its functions guides plant design and operation. Given Data / Assumptions: Raw sewage enters the Imhoff tank. Gravity separation and sludge handling occur internally. No mechanical aeration is provided. Concept / Approach: The upper compartment allows sedimentation of suspended solids. The lower compartment isolates settled sludge for anaerobic digestion, reducing volume and odors. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Inflow passes to the upper chamber for sedimentation.Step 2: Solids settle through slots to the lower digestion chamber.Step 3: Anaerobic digestion stabilizes sludge, producing gas. Verification / Alternative check: Classic Imhoff design diagrams show distinct settling and digestion zones with gas vents. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Filtration and aeration are not core functions of an Imhoff tank; choosing only one of sedimentation or digestion ignores the two-stage design. Common Pitfalls: Confusing Imhoff tanks with septic tanks or primary clarifiers; Imhoff integrates sedimentation with isolated sludge digestion. Final Answer: Both sedimentation and digestion

Question 15

In drinking water treatment, what is the correct process term for intentionally killing disease-causing organisms (pathogens) in water while not necessarily achieving complete sterilization of all forms of life?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In municipal and industrial water treatment, we aim to supply safe water by inactivating microorganisms that cause disease. The technical term used for this targeted microbial control step is often confused with other unit processes like coagulation or sedimentation. This question checks whether you can distinguish the purpose and scope of disinfection from related processes and from the more absolute concept of sterilization. Given Data / Assumptions: Context is potable water treatment. Goal is to kill or inactivate pathogens to make water safe. Complete elimination of all life is not required in routine potable treatment. Concept / Approach: Disinfection is the targeted inactivation of pathogens (bacteria, viruses, protozoa). Sterilization means destruction of all forms of microbial life including spores, which is not economical or necessary for drinking water. Coagulation and sedimentation remove particles but do not reliably kill pathogens. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the goal: pathogen inactivation to protect public health. 2) Map the goal to the process term: disinfection accomplishes this. 3) Exclude processes that mainly remove turbidity or solids: coagulation and sedimentation are physical-chemical clarification steps. 4) Exclude sterilization because it implies total microbial destruction, which is beyond typical potable treatment requirements. Verification / Alternative check: Typical disinfectants include free chlorine, chloramines, chlorine dioxide, ozone, and UV radiation. Regulatory frameworks use CT (concentration * time) or UV dose to verify adequate disinfection, not sterilization. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Coagulation: Aggregates fine particles; does not kill reliably. Sterilization: Implies total kill including spores; unnecessary in drinking water practice. Sedimentation: Settles floc; does not provide pathogen inactivation by itself. Common Pitfalls: Assuming clarification equals microbial safety; equating disinfectant residual with complete sterilization; overlooking the need to maintain a small disinfectant residual in the distribution system to control regrowth. Final Answer: Disinfection

Question 16

In a public water supply, what is the maximum permissible concentration (Threshold Limit Value, TLV) of DDT in drinking water, expressed in micrograms per litre (μg/L)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: DDT is a persistent organochlorine pesticide with well-known environmental persistence and bioaccumulation. Drinking water standards assign very low allowable limits to protect human health. This question checks whether you recall the order of magnitude of the limit and can distinguish it from unrealistic high values. Given Data / Assumptions: Parameter: DDT concentration in drinking water. Unit: micrograms per litre (μg/L). Context: public water supply compliance limit. Concept / Approach: Guideline and regulatory limits for persistent pesticides in drinking water are typically in the low microgram per litre range or lower. Values like tens, hundreds, or thousands of μg/L would be far above health-protective limits for DDT. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recall that DDT limits are set very low due to toxicity and persistence. 2) Compare options: 2, 42, 332, 1050 μg/L. 3) Only 2 μg/L matches the expected guideline magnitude for DDT in potable water. 4) Therefore select 2 μg/L as the permissible concentration limit. Verification / Alternative check: Public-health guidance places DDT limits at very low levels to minimize chronic exposure risk, aligning with the lowest option provided in the set. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 42 μg/L: Far too high for a persistent pesticide limit. 332 μg/L: Orders of magnitude higher than typical guidelines. 1050 μg/L: Not credible for potable water standards. Common Pitfalls: Misreading μg/L as mg/L; assuming legacy pesticides have lenient limits; forgetting that bioaccumulative chemicals are regulated stringently. Final Answer: 2 μg/L

Question 17

Among the listed sources, which activity releases the maximum amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere on a global scale?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Global carbon dioxide emissions are dominated by certain human activities. Understanding relative magnitudes helps in environmental engineering, climate policy, and air quality management. This question asks you to identify the largest CO2 contributor among the given choices. Given Data / Assumptions: Comparison among four listed sources only. Scope is global scale, not a single facility or event. CO2 is the gas of interest. Concept / Approach: Combustion of fossil fuels in power generation, industry, and transport is the dominant anthropogenic CO2 source worldwide. While biomass burning emits CO2, much of it is part of short-term biogenic cycles. Urea usage and trees are not dominant sources in this framing; trees are typically net CO2 sinks when healthy. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the anthropogenic process with sustained, large-scale carbon oxidation: fossil fuel combustion. 2) Compare with urea: minor contributor relative to energy-sector combustion. 3) Compare with biomass burning: significant episodically, but generally smaller than global fossil fuel combustion totals. 4) Trees: typically absorb CO2 via photosynthesis, not a net source under normal conditions. Verification / Alternative check: Energy statistics consistently attribute the majority of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to burning coal, oil, and natural gas for electricity, heat, transport, and industry. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Urea: emissions exist but are small compared to fossil fuels. Biomass burning: episodic and region-specific; still less than fossil fuel totals. Trees: generally act as CO2 sinks, not sources. Common Pitfalls: Confusing biogenic short-cycle CO2 with long-term fossil carbon emissions; overestimating agricultural chemical contributions relative to energy. Final Answer: Combustion of fossil fuels and fuels

Question 18

Air pollution control: identify the wrong statement about visible haze at chimney exit, bag filters at very high temperature, and electrostatic precipitators for sub-micronic dust removal.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Engineers select particulate control equipment by balancing efficiency, temperature tolerance, pressure drop, maintenance, and operating cost. This question asks you to spot the incorrect statement about common devices and operating cues. Given Data / Assumptions: Devices considered: bag filter (fabric filter) and electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Operating cue: visible haze at chimney top. Particle size of interest: sub-micronic regime. Concept / Approach: Fabric filters are highly efficient for fine particles but they impose a moderate to high pressure drop and typically cannot operate at very high gas temperatures without cooling or high-temperature fabrics. ESPs achieve very high efficiency for fine particles with comparatively lower pressure drop. Visible haze or smoke indicates incomplete combustion and higher particulate carryover, not ideal combustion. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Evaluate statement about haze: good combustion should be essentially smokeless; persistent haze usually signals issues, so the claim of good combustion is questionable. 2) Evaluate bag filter statement: saying very small pressure drop at very high temperature is inaccurate; fabric filters have notable pressure drop and temperature limits. 3) Evaluate ESP statement: ESPs are indeed very efficient for sub-micron particles in many applications. 4) Therefore, the clearly wrong statement is the one about bag filters. Verification / Alternative check: Typical pressure drop across bag filters is several centimeters of water gauge and temperatures may require gas cooling or special fabrics, confirming that the statement claiming very small pressure drop at very high temperature is incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a) is also suspicious, but not as technically definitive as (b) in all contexts; some transient plumes may occur while still having acceptable combustion. Option (c) is correct for many industrial cases. Option (d) claims that none are wrong, which is not true. Common Pitfalls: Assuming all fabric filters can tolerate furnace exit temperatures; ignoring pressure-drop penalties; conflating occasional visible water vapor plumes with smoke due to incomplete combustion. Final Answer: A bag filter has very small pressure drop and is highly efficient for removing sub-micronic dust from very hot flue gas.

Question 19

Laundry and water quality: brown spotting on washed fabrics is most commonly caused by which dissolved constituent present in high concentration?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Household water quality directly affects laundering outcomes. Elevated concentrations of certain dissolved metals can stain fabrics during washing or drying. This question tests practical understanding of iron-related staining phenomena in domestic water supplies. Given Data / Assumptions: Observation: brown spots on fabrics after washing. Source: dissolved constituents in supply water. No specialty chemicals or dyes are assumed. Concept / Approach: Iron in water can exist as ferrous (Fe2+) or ferric (Fe3+) forms. Upon aeration or oxidation (e.g., exposure to oxygen, chlorine), ferrous iron converts to ferric hydroxide particulates, which deposit on fabrics, creating yellow-brown to rust-colored stains. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Link observed color (brown/rust) to common water metals. 2) Iron is well known for rust-like staining when oxidized. 3) Zinc, iodine, and bromine are not commonly implicated in brown fabric spotting in typical domestic scenarios. 4) Therefore, iron is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Practical mitigation includes installing iron removal units, using appropriate oxidants and filtration, or using sequestration agents. Consistency with known domestic water complaints supports the identification of iron as the culprit. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Zinc: Typically colorless at normal levels; not a brown stain former. Iodine: Can cause yellowish tints at high levels but is uncommon in this context. Bromine: Rare in domestic supplies and would not produce rust-brown spots. Common Pitfalls: Confusing tannins or manganese staining with iron; however, manganese tends to produce darker blackish stains, while tannins may cause yellow tea-like discoloration rather than distinct rust spots. Final Answer: Iron

Question 20

During potable water treatment, disinfection primarily results in the removal or inactivation of which target from the water?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Water treatment trains include clarification, filtration, and disinfection. Each step has a distinct purpose. This question focuses on the principal outcome of the disinfection step and differentiates it from aesthetic or hardness control processes. Given Data / Assumptions: Process: disinfection (e.g., chlorine, chloramines, ozone, UV). Objective: public health protection. Not focused on aesthetic parameters like taste, odor, or hardness. Concept / Approach: Disinfection is designed to inactivate pathogenic microorganisms. Turbidity reduction is mainly achieved through coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration. Odor control may involve oxidation, air stripping, or activated carbon. Hardness is addressed via lime softening or ion exchange, not by disinfection. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify what disinfection does: kills or inactivates microbes. 2) Exclude turbidity: that is a solids removal function. 3) Exclude odor: may be reduced incidentally by oxidants but is not the primary aim. 4) Exclude hardness: requires separate chemical treatment. Verification / Alternative check: Regulatory compliance typically references log removal or inactivation targets for Giardia, viruses, and other pathogens, confirming the primary purpose of disinfection. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Turbidity: addressed earlier by clarification and filtration. Odor: sometimes improved by oxidants, but not the principal metric of disinfection success. Hardness: controlled by softening processes. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any oxidant use equals comprehensive odor removal; overlooking that high turbidity can shield microbes and reduce disinfection efficacy, which is why turbidity control precedes disinfection. Final Answer: Bacteria and pathogens

Environmental Engineering Questions