Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:“Cascading” is a common term in logic design, counters, decoders, multiplexers, and amplifiers. Understanding its meaning determines how you expand bit-width, range, or functionality. This question challenges the misconception that cascading is the same as connecting in parallel.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:To cascade is to chain stages so that behavior accumulates across devices. For counters, the ripple or synchronous carry-out of one device connects to the enable/carry-in of the next to extend modulus. For decoders or multiplexers, cascade control pins are used similarly to increase address range or number of channels.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Recall the canonical use: two 4-bit counters cascaded to form an 8-bit counter.Observe that the first counter’s carry drives the second counter’s enable or clock input.This is a series connection that extends range, not a parallel connection.Therefore, the statement equating cascade to parallel is incorrect.Verification / Alternative check:Manufacturer datasheets show “cascading” diagrams labeled with carry/borrow links between packages to scale capacity—clearly a series relationship.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Correct: Would redefine “cascade” incorrectly.Only true for tri-state buses / Valid for analog multiplexing only: These distract from the basic definition; cascading is not inherently parallel in those contexts either.Common Pitfalls:Confusing bus width expansion (parallel) with range expansion (cascade), and miswiring carry/enable pins leading to nonfunctional designs.
Final Answer:Incorrect
Discussion & Comments