In C on a typical PC, consider aliasing a float as bytes and printing the first byte's numeric value. What does this program output? #include<stdio.h> int main() { float a = 3.14; char j; j = (char)&a; // alias the float's storage as bytes printf("%d ", *j); // print the first byte as an integer return 0; }

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: It will print a garbage value

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This question examines how C represents floating-point values in memory and what happens when you reinterpret that storage as bytes. The code takes the address of a float, casts it to a char pointer, and prints the numeric value of the first byte. Because byte order and float encodings are implementation-dependent, the printed number is not portable.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • float a = 3.14 is stored using the platform’s float representation (often IEEE-754 single precision).
  • char j = (char)&a reinterprets the float’s memory as a sequence of bytes.
  • printf("%d", j) promotes the first byte to int and prints its numeric value.
  • Endianness (little vs big) and exact float encoding affect which byte is read and its value.


Concept / Approach:
Reinterpreting object representation through a different type exposes raw bytes, not characters or digits. The first byte of a float that holds 3.14 does not correspond to the ASCII code for '3' nor any predictable printable character. C does not guarantee how the bytes are ordered in memory or the exact internal representation beyond certain broad rules.



Step-by-Step Solution:
Store 3.14 in a float variable a.Take its address, cast to char, assign to j.Dereference j to read the first byte of a’s storage.Print that byte as a signed int; the numeric value depends on encoding and endianness.Therefore the observed value is not portable or predictable across systems.



Verification / Alternative check:
Run on two different architectures (e.g., x86 vs ARM) or with different compilers/optimization levels; outputs frequently differ. Changing to printf("%f", a) would portably print 3.140000, but the current code prints an opaque byte value.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
ASCII/character claims misinterpret raw bytes as text. Printing '3' would require encoding a textual '3' byte, which is not how floats are stored. A universal fixed value is not guaranteed.



Common Pitfalls:
Confusing internal binary representation with human-readable digits; assuming endianness; relying on byte-level hacks for logic.



Final Answer:
It will print a garbage value

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion