Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Datasheets show that a BJT’s DC current gain (beta or h_FE) is not a universal constant; it varies with collector current, temperature, and device geometry. This question checks whether the variation follows a strict inverse proportionality with collector current, as sometimes mistakenly assumed.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Empirically, beta typically rises with Ic from very small currents to a moderate range, reaches a plateau, and then may fall at high Ic due to high-level injection and other effects. This nonmonotonic behavior contradicts “inversely proportional.” While small-signal transconductance gm = Ic / V_T does scale with Ic, beta = Ic / Ib does not follow a simple 1/Ic law.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Define beta = Ic / Ib; observe that both Ic and Ib are bias-dependent.Consult typical curves: beta increases from microamp to milliamp region, then rolls off.Conclude there is no strict inverse relationship with Ic.Design with margins to accommodate beta spread and variation.Verification / Alternative check:Examine manufacturer graphs (h_FE vs Ic) for popular BJTs (e.g., 2N3904, BC547); curves clearly are not a simple inverse function.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct”: contradicts real device behavior.Frequency- or topology-specific claims do not resolve the fundamental dependence.VBE knowledge is unnecessary to refute the inverse law claim.Common Pitfalls:Assuming a fixed beta for precision calculations; ignoring temperature and process variation that broaden beta ranges.
Final Answer:Incorrect
Discussion & Comments