Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: (ΔT)^(1/4) (inversely proportional)
Explanation:
Introduction:
Nusselt’s analysis for laminar film condensation on a vertical plate provides a closed-form scaling for the average heat-transfer coefficient. It reveals how physical properties and the temperature driving force influence condensate film thickness and heat transfer.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The classical result gives h_avg ∝ [ (ρ_l (ρ_l − ρ_v) g k_l^3 h_fg) / (μ_l L ΔT) ]^(1/4). Because ΔT appears in the denominator inside the brackets, the overall dependence is h ∝ (ΔT)^(−1/4), i.e., inversely proportional to ΔT raised to the one-fourth power. Larger ΔT slightly thickens the film (via increased condensate flow), which reduces h modestly in this laminar regime.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Comparisons with experimental data validate the weak inverse quarter-power dependence over the laminar range; deviations arise with vapor shear or turbulence in the film.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A/B/D predict much stronger inverse dependences than theory supports; E is incorrect since ΔT does influence h via the film flow rate.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing condensation with convection where h often grows with ΔT; here, film dynamics impose the inverse relationship.
Final Answer:
(ΔT)^(1/4) (inversely proportional)
Discussion & Comments