Shell-and-tube heat exchangers – Purpose of shell-side baffles What is the principal effect of installing baffles on the shell side of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: increase the shell side heat transfer co-efficient.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Baffles are common internals in shell-and-tube exchangers. Their geometry and spacing critically impact shell-side hydrodynamics, pressure drop, and heat transfer. Understanding their role guides trade-offs between performance and pumping cost.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Single-phase shell-side flow; no phase change considered.
  • Reasonable baffle cut and spacing practices.
  • Goal: enhance heat transfer without excessive vibration or bypassing.


Concept / Approach:
Baffles direct shell-side flow across the tube bundle, creating crossflow and local turbulence, interrupting boundary layers, and reducing bypass streams. This increases the shell-side heat transfer coefficient h_s. It does not increase cross-sectional flow area; rather, it constrains flow path and raises velocity, typically increasing pressure drop as a trade-off.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Add baffles ⇒ induce crossflow and turbulence.Crossflow interrupts thermal boundary layers ⇒ higher h_s.Parallel flow is minimized; leakage/bypass controlled with proper sealing strips.Therefore, the main effect is increased shell-side heat transfer coefficient.Select option (c).


Verification / Alternative check:
Bell–Delaware methods quantify h_s and pressure drop improvements due to baffles and associated correction factors for leakage and bypass streams.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Increase cross-section: Opposite; effective flow area is restricted.
  • Force parallel flow: Incorrect; baffles create crossflow.
  • Decrease h_s: Contradicts the purpose of baffles.


Common Pitfalls:
Over-tight spacing causing high pressure drop and tube vibration; optimal design balances heat transfer gains and mechanical limits.


Final Answer:
increase the shell side heat transfer co-efficient.

More Questions from Heat Transfer

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion