Atmospheric pressure as a hydrostatic head:\nWhich of the following is the closest equivalent of 1 atm in terms of fluid column height?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 34 ft of H2O

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Engineering calculations often require converting standard atmospheric pressure into an equivalent height of a liquid column. Knowing these equivalences helps when reading manometers, sizing barometric condensers, or interpreting pressure heads in piping systems.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • 1 atm ≈ 101.325 kPa.
  • Equivalent heads: about 10.33 m of water, 33.9–34.0 ft of water, and 760 mm (76 cm) of mercury at standard conditions.
  • Densities and gravity at standard conditions are implied.


Concept / Approach:
The hydrostatic relation is ΔP = ρ g h. For a given pressure, required height h is inversely proportional to liquid density ρ. Thus, a denser fluid like mercury needs a much shorter column than water to balance atmospheric pressure. Recognized “rules of thumb” are typically used in quick selections.


Step-by-Step Solution:

For water: 1 atm ≈ 10.33 m H2O ≈ 33.9 ft H2O → rounded to 34 ft H2O.For mercury: 1 atm ≈ 760 mm Hg = 76 cm Hg, not 13.6 cm Hg (13.6 is mercury’s specific gravity).For 1 m H2O: 1 m is only about 0.097 atm, far less than 1 atm.For 13.6 m Hg: that would correspond to ~13.6 atm (clearly incorrect).


Verification / Alternative check:
Using ΔP = ρ g h with ρ_H2O ≈ 1000 kg/m^3 and g ≈ 9.81 m/s^2 yields h ≈ 10.33 m for 101.325 kPa. Converting 10.33 m to feet gives ~33.9 ft.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 13.6 cm Hg confuses mercury’s specific gravity with the required head.
  • 1 m H2O is too small; it does not balance 1 atm.
  • 13.6 m Hg is far too large.
  • (Extra reference) 760 mm Hg is correct but was provided as an additional option; the best match among the listed head choices is 34 ft of H2O.


Common Pitfalls:
Mixing up 13.6 (SG of Hg) with 76 cm; ignoring unit conversions between metric and imperial; forgetting that heads scale inversely with density.


Final Answer:
34 ft of H2O

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion