Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 36 years, 9 years
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This item blends a present-time linear relation (the sum of ages) with a past-time multiplicative relation. Such problems are standard in algebraic age reasoning and test the ability to translate verbal statements into equations and apply factor reasoning efficiently.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Use the product condition from five years ago. If (F − 5)(S − 5) = 4(F − 5), then either (F − 5) = 0 or (S − 5) = 4. The first case would give F = 5, which cannot fit a realistic father–son pair with sum 45. Hence use the second case to determine S, then use the sum to obtain F.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider (F − 5) = 0 ⇒ F = 5. Then S = 40, inconsistent for a father–son pair and contradicts typical expectations, so discard. The chosen pair satisfies both constraints exactly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Each alternative pair either violates the sum 45 or fails the past product relation when tested numerically.
Common Pitfalls:
Missing the factor trick and expanding fully (creating unnecessary algebra), or accepting the unrealistic F = 5 branch without checking plausibility.
Final Answer:
36 years, 9 years
Discussion & Comments