Exit gradient at downstream of a weir or barrage floor as per Khosla’s theory: On which non-dimensional parameter does the exit gradient primarily depend?
-
AThe ratio of floor length to depth of downstream cutoff (b/d)
-
BIndependent of b/d ratio
-
CIndependent of depths of downstream cutoff walls
-
DNone of these
-
EOnly on upstream head
Answer
Correct Answer: The ratio of floor length to depth of downstream cutoff (b/d)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Exit gradient governs piping safety at the downstream edge of hydraulic structures such as barrages and weirs. Khosla’s theory of independent variables provides a rational framework to compute uplift pressures and gradients beneath floors with cutoffs.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Pervious foundation; floor with upstream and downstream sheet piles (cutoffs).
- Focus on exit gradient at the downstream end.
- Steady seepage conditions.
Concept / Approach:Khosla’s method shows that uplift and gradients depend on geometric ratios rather than absolute sizes. A key parameter is b/d, where b is the floor length and d is the depth of the downstream cutoff. Larger b and deeper d reduce the exit gradient, improving safety against piping and heave.
Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify controlling geometric variables in potential flow beneath floors.2) Normalize dimensions to build b/d ratio.3) Recognize exit gradient g_exit decreases as b/d increases.4) Conclude dependence primarily on b/d, consistent with Khosla’s curves/tables.
Verification / Alternative check:Design charts derived from Khosla’s theory tabulate pressure and gradient coefficients for various b/d values, confirming sensitivity to this ratio. Field experience also correlates safer performance with deeper downstream cutoffs or longer floors (higher b/d).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Independent of b/d: contradicts the very basis of Khosla’s independent variable approach.
- Independent of cutoff depth: not true; d appears in b/d.
- Only on upstream head: head influences magnitude but geometric ratio b/d controls gradient distribution shape.
Common Pitfalls:
- Using absolute dimensions without non-dimensionalizing; leads to inconsistent conclusions.
- Neglecting downstream cutoff depth under the assumption that upstream cutoff dominates.
Final Answer:The ratio of floor length to depth of downstream cutoff (b/d).