IRQ planning: given a PC with COM1 on IRQ 4 (mouse), a modem on COM2 using IRQ 3, a SCSI host adapter on IRQ 5, and a sound card on IRQ 11, which supported IRQ could you assign to the new network interface card without conflicts?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 10

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Legacy PCs required careful manual assignment of IRQs to avoid conflicts between ISA devices. This scenario asks you to choose a free interrupt for a NIC when several common IRQs are already taken by serial ports, a SCSI controller, and a sound card.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • COM1 (mouse) uses IRQ 4.
  • COM2 (modem) uses IRQ 3.
  • SCSI host adapter uses IRQ 5.
  • Sound card uses IRQ 11.
  • NIC supports IRQs: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11.
  • Standard LPT1 uses IRQ 7; IDE uses 14/15 (not conflicting here).


Concept / Approach:

Pick an IRQ not already used. 4 and 3 are busy (serial ports), 5 is busy (SCSI), and 11 is busy (sound). IRQ 2 historically cascades to IRQ 9 on AT-class machines; many configurations prefer avoiding 2/9 unless planned carefully. IRQ 10 is commonly free and a traditional choice for NICs, ensuring no overlap with existing devices.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Eliminate IRQs already occupied: 3, 4, 5, 11.Consider IRQ 2/9 mapping: may work, but can conflict with other devices using 9; conservative choice avoids it.Select IRQ 10 as free and supported by the NIC.Verify by boot tests and diagnostics for interrupt sharing errors.


Verification / Alternative check:

Historical configuration guides list IRQ 10 as a common, conflict-free selection for network cards when 3/4/5/7/11 are taken.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

2: Often tied to 9; may create hidden conflicts.

4: Already used by COM1.

5: Used by SCSI adapter.

None of the above: Incorrect because IRQ 10 is suitable.


Common Pitfalls:

Overlooking the IRQ 2↔9 cascade; forgetting default serial/parallel assignments; choosing an IRQ used by Plug and Play devices.


Final Answer:

10

More Questions from Windows NT

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion