Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: FRINGE
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This analogy hides a positional shift pattern. We must infer how each position in the first mapping is shifted, then apply the inverse of those shifts to decode the unknown source that would produce the target cipher.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute per-position shifts s so that for each i, c_i = p_i + s_i (mod 26). From W→H etc., we deduce a positional pattern. To recover the unknown source for QEHMDF, compute p_i = c_i − s_i (mod 26) at each position and match with the option that fits cleanly and forms a meaningful word.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Forward-encoding FRINGE with the corresponding per-position shifts reconstructs the target pattern structure, confirming it as the best fit from the listed options.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming a single uniform Caesar shift; ignoring that each position may use a distinct displacement; forgetting modular wrap-around.
Final Answer:
FRINGE
Discussion & Comments