Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 2 and 3 only
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Routing protocols differ in how they disseminate information. Distance-vector protocols share entire tables periodically, while link-state protocols advertise link-state information (LSAs) and build a full topology locally. Distinguishing these behaviors is vital for predicting convergence and bandwidth use.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Statement 2 is true: distance-vector protocols periodically send their routing tables (in RIP, every 30 seconds). Statement 3 is true: link-state protocols flood link-state advertisements about their own links; routers then compute shortest paths using algorithms like Dijkstra. Statement 1 is false because link-state does not send full routing tables periodically; instead, LSAs are sent on changes and at refresh intervals, not wholesale tables. Statement 4 is false for distance-vector because DV does not send only link states; it sends distance vectors (routes and metrics), not raw link-state data to all routers.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Classify each statement as DV or LS.Mark 2 (DV periodic full table) as true.Mark 3 (LSA flooding of link states) as true.Mark 1 and 4 as false based on protocol mechanics.Select “2 and 3 only.”
Verification / Alternative check:
Protocol RFCs and textbooks confirm DV periodic timers and LS flooding mechanisms with separate SPF computations.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming link-state sends “routing tables”; it sends LSAs, not computed final routes.
Final Answer:
2 and 3 only
Discussion & Comments