Which of the following statements is correct about namespaces in C#.NET?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Namespaces help developers control scope and visibility of the elements contained within them, preventing naming conflicts across assemblies.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Namespaces in C#.NET are fundamental for organizing code, avoiding name clashes, and controlling visibility. This question tests whether you understand what namespaces actually do and clears up common myths about their usage in day-to-day development.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • C#.NET supports hierarchical (nested) namespaces.
  • Types can be referenced with fully qualified names or via using directives.
  • Framework Class Library (FCL) already ships with well-defined namespaces.


Concept / Approach:
Think of a namespace as a logical container. It does not change runtime behavior of a type but organizes source code and enables disambiguation (System.Console vs. YourCompany.Console). The using directive is a convenience; it does not change the compiled type name.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Evaluate Option A: Correct. Namespaces logically group related types and help manage scope/visibility and name conflicts.Evaluate Option B: Incorrect. C# fully supports nested namespaces.Evaluate Option C: Incorrect. If you omit a namespace, your type resides in the global namespace, not a special 'root' name.Evaluate Option D: Incorrect. You can always use fully qualified names (for example, System.Console.WriteLine) without a using directive.Evaluate Option E: Incorrect/misleading. The FCL is already organized by Microsoft; developers consume it, not reorganize it.


Verification / Alternative check:
Write a class without any namespace and reference it from another assembly by its global name. Also call Console.WriteLine with and without using System; you will see both approaches compile.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
B denies nesting; C invents a non-existent default name; D ignores fully qualified names; E confuses consumer responsibilities with framework design.



Common Pitfalls:
Assuming using is mandatory, or believing types default to a special named namespace instead of the global namespace.



Final Answer:
Namespaces help developers control scope and visibility of the elements contained within them, preventing naming conflicts across assemblies.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion