Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Toughness
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Many real-world parts—hammers, springs, axles, couplings, and crash structures—are subjected to sudden, dynamic loads. The ability to survive such events depends on a particular property that combines strength with ductility so that energy can be absorbed without catastrophic brittle fracture.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Toughness is the energy a material can absorb before fracturing. It is represented by the area under the stress–strain curve up to fracture and is often assessed by impact tests (Charpy/Izod). High strength alone is not sufficient; a strong but brittle material may shatter under impact. Stiffness (high modulus) limits elastic deflection but does not ensure energy absorption. Hardness resists indentation/abrasion, not impact failure. Brittleness is the opposite of what is desired for shock loads.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the performance need: absorb energy without cracking.Relate to property: toughness = energy absorption to fracture.Eliminate distractors: strength ≠ energy absorption, stiffness ≠ impact safety, hardness ≠ shock resistance, brittleness is harmful.Select toughness as the key property.
Verification / Alternative check:
Impact test data (e.g., Charpy V-notch) correlate with service survivability in impact-prone applications.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Strength: needed but insufficient if ductility is low.
Stiffness: controls elastic deflection, not fracture energy.
Brittleness: promotes sudden crack propagation.
Hardness: relates to wear, not to energy absorption.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating “strong” with “safe under impact”; overlooking notch sensitivity and temperature effects on toughness.
Final Answer:
Toughness
Discussion & Comments