Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: naked eye
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Materials are examined at multiple size scales, from macroscopic features visible without aids to atomic-scale structures. Macro-examination is the first, simplest step and often reveals manufacturing defects, heat-treatment issues, and fracture features before more advanced methods are used.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Macro-structure is evaluated by the unaided eye (or at most with a low-power lens). This contrasts with microstructure, which requires optical or electron microscopy after careful sample preparation. X-ray methods probe internal defects and crystallography, not macro-structure per se.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Define macro-structure: features observable at low magnification or no magnification.Relate to inspection practice: visual inspection, dye penetrant background assessment, fracture surface macroscopic morphology.Therefore, “naked eye” is the appropriate tool for macro-structure.Higher-magnification devices move into microstructure or sub-surface analysis.
Verification / Alternative check:
Quality-control workflows begin with visual examination before advancing to metallography or NDT (ultrasonic, radiography).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Optical/metallurgical microscopes target microstructure; X-ray methods are NDT tools for internal characterization; SEM is far beyond macro-scale.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any microscope examination is still “macro” because of large field of view; by convention, macro-structure is unaided or very low power only.
Final Answer:
naked eye
Discussion & Comments