Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: all of these
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Patterns create mould cavities that define the external shape of castings. The choice of pattern material affects dimensional accuracy, surface finish, tool life, and cost. Recognising the diversity of viable pattern materials is critical for process planning across sand and investment casting.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Aluminium is a common metal pattern material: it is light, machinable, and dimensionally stable. Wax is universally used as expendable patterns in investment casting (lost-wax), where patterns are sacrificed during dewaxing. Low-melting metals like lead have been used historically for special patterns, gauges, or short-run work; modern practice may prefer aluminium or plastics for health and handling reasons, but lead remains a feasible material in controlled environments.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify each option’s role: aluminium for durable, precise metal patterns.Wax for expendable patterns in investment casting trees.Lead as a low-melt option historically/for limited cases.Hence, all listed materials can serve as pattern materials.
Verification / Alternative check:
Process manuals show aluminium patterns for high-volume sand casting, wax for investment casting, and various metals (including low-melting) used where appropriate.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Rejecting any single material ignores established processes (e.g., lost-wax for wax patterns).
“None of these” contradicts standard practice.
Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking safety and environmental protocols for lead; not accounting for thermal expansion differences among pattern materials; ignoring draft and shrinkage allowances specific to each process.
Final Answer:
all of these
Discussion & Comments