Output polarity range: Which class of DACs can generate both positive and negative analog output values (about a defined zero level)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Bipolar

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Some applications require signals that swing around a zero reference, such as audio waveforms or servo commands. DACs designed for such use must support both positive and negative outputs. The correct terminology distinguishes these from unipolar-only devices that output one polarity relative to ground.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • We consider the DAC’s native output range, not a later level-shifting stage.
  • A defined midscale corresponds to approximately zero volts in a bipolar configuration.
  • Reference and amplifier networks are arranged to support two-polarity swing.


Concept / Approach:
A bipolar DAC or bipolar output configuration can produce both positive and negative voltages with respect to ground (or another reference), typically using dual supplies or level-shifting around a midscale reference. Unipolar DACs output from zero to a positive full-scale (or zero to a negative full-scale) and cannot cross zero without added analog conditioning.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify requirement: output must cross zero and swing both ways.Match term: “bipolar” specifically denotes two polarities.Select the answer “Bipolar.”


Verification / Alternative check:
Datasheets specify ranges like “±10 V bipolar” versus “0 to 10 V unipolar,” confirming the terminology used in practice.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Tristate: Refers to digital output high-impedance states, not analog polarity.Double: Not a standard DAC range descriptor.Unilateral: Not a conventional term for DAC ranges; unipolar is the typical counterpart to bipolar.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any DAC can be made bipolar without considering headroom, references, and amplifier rails.



Final Answer:
Bipolar

More Questions from Interfacing to the Analog World

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion