Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Large shell–tube temperature differences (> 50 °C) to accommodate differential expansion
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Shell-and-tube heat exchangers come in several TEMA configurations. The floating-head type allows one end of the tube bundle to move relative to the shell, accommodating differential thermal expansion and simplifying mechanical cleaning—critical in many services with large temperature differences or fouling.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Fixed-tube-sheet exchangers are economical but susceptible to thermal stress when ΔT is large. U-tube and floating-head designs relieve thermal expansion. Floating-head units also permit easy tube-bundle removal for mechanical cleaning of both sides, making them attractive for fouling services as well as high ΔT operation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the challenge: differential expansion at high ΔT causes stress in fixed configurations.Select design with axial freedom: floating head provides movement and maintenance access.Therefore, choose floating head when ΔT is large (commonly > 50 °C) and/or fouling requires bundle removal.
Verification / Alternative check:
Mechanical design analyses show reduced thermal stresses with floating-head arrangements; many TEMA types (e.g., AES, AET) are specified for such duties.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) Corrosion resistance is mainly a materials selection issue; floating head does not inherently solve corrosion. (c) and (d) concern flow arrangement, not head type. (e) contradicts a key floating-head advantage.
Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking fouling/cleaning requirements; assuming U-tube always suffices when true counter-current temperature profiles or tube-side cleaning access is needed.
Final Answer:
Large shell–tube temperature differences (> 50 °C) to accommodate differential expansion
Discussion & Comments