Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A liquid-phase reactor
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Operational safety of reactors depends on controllability of temperature, pressure, and reaction rate. Among common reactor modes (vapor-phase, liquid-phase, catalytic, and batch “pot” reactors), engineers favor configurations that offer strong heat removal, thermal inertia, and lower stored energy to minimize runaway risks and overpressure.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Liquid-phase reactors are generally safer because liquids have higher heat capacities and thermal conductivities than gases, enabling faster heat removal and better damping of temperature excursions. Vapor-phase systems typically have lower heat capacity, faster kinetics at higher temperatures, and may store significant pressurized energy. Batch “pot” reactors can be safe when well-designed, but transient operation and charge-to-charge variability complicate control versus a steady liquid-phase continuous unit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Safety reviews, hazard and operability studies (HAZOP), and incidents data frequently highlight gas-phase units as less forgiving during upsets. Conversely, many highly exothermic industrial reactions are purposely kept in liquid-phase CSTRs or loop reactors to leverage strong heat removal.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Equating “catalytic” with “safe.” Catalysts may improve selectivity but introduce hot-spot risks. Also, overlooking relief system design and cooling redundancy can negate phase advantages.
Final Answer:
A liquid-phase reactor
Discussion & Comments