Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Agree
Explanation:
Introduction:
Rectangular weirs are categorized as suppressed or contracted depending on whether the nappe contracts at the side walls. In discharge calculations, a correction using the count of end contractions n is applied to the effective width. This question checks whether the learner knows that in a fully suppressed weir, the side contractions are absent and thus n is taken as zero in the standard formula.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The practical discharge expression for a rectangular weir includes side contraction adjustments. For a contracted weir, the effective width b_e is reduced from the physical width b by a term proportional to n * h, where h is the head over crest and n is the number of end contractions (0, 1, or 2). A “suppressed” weir has no lateral contraction, therefore n = 0, and the effective width equals the channel width. This increases discharge relative to an otherwise similar contracted weir at the same head.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Laboratory correlations and design manuals consistently treat suppressed rectangular weirs with n = 0 because the side nappe is constrained by the channel walls and cannot contract laterally.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Disagree: Contradicts the standard definition of a suppressed weir.n = 1 for one side suppressed: That setting corresponds to exactly one contracted side, which is not “fully suppressed”.n = 2 for fully suppressed: Reverses the meaning; n = 2 is for two end contractions (both sides free).n depends only on head: Side contraction depends on geometry, not only on head.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “suppressed” with “submerged” or thinking the contraction count changes with head. Suppression refers to geometry (absence of side contraction), so n = 0 is a structural condition.
Final Answer:
Agree
Discussion & Comments