Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: A routing technique in which the sender specifies the complete or partial path that a packet should follow through the network, listing the sequence of routers or nodes in the packet header.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Most routing on the Internet relies on routers making independent forwarding decisions based on their routing tables. However, there is also a concept called source routing, where the sender exerts direct control over the path a packet takes. This question asks you to explain what a source route is and how it changes the usual forwarding mechanism in a network.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In source routing, the sender includes a list of intermediate nodes, often routers, in the packet header. This list can represent the complete path from source to destination or a partial path. Routers along the way read this list and forward the packet to the next specified hop rather than relying solely on their usual routing tables. Source routing may be used for testing, diagnostic purposes, or special routing policies. It contrasts with standard hop by hop routing where each router independently chooses the next hop based on its own table. Source routing is not the same as broadcasting or static addressing and does not itself provide encryption.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Note that the term source route suggests that the route is determined at the source.Step 2: Recall that in source routing mechanisms, the packet header contains a route list specifying the sequence of routers or nodes.Step 3: Intermediate routers consult this route list and forward the packet to the next specified hop rather than deciding the next hop from their usual routing tables alone.Step 4: Option A captures this behaviour by stating that the sender specifies the complete or partial path and lists routers in the header.Step 5: Option B describes normal hop by hop routing where the destination or routers choose the path dynamically, which is not source routing.Step 6: Option C describes broadcasting, where packets are forwarded to all neighbours, not a specified sequence.Step 7: Option D incorrectly associates source routing with encryption, which is a separate feature provided by security protocols.Step 8: Option E incorrectly treats source routing as static address assignment, which belongs to network configuration tasks.
Verification / Alternative check:
IP once included options for loose and strict source routing, where a sender could supply a list of routers to be visited. Tools such as traceroute and some diagnostic utilities have used related concepts in controlled environments. Although source routing is rarely used on the public Internet today due to security concerns, its definition remains standard in networking documentation and exam material. These sources consistently describe source routing as sender specified paths embedded in packet headers, confirming option A.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B simply restates normal dynamic routing behaviour without any explicit path from the source. Option C describes flooding or broadcasting, which is a different forwarding method used in some routing protocols. Option D mixes in security features, which are not inherent to source routing. Option E talks about static IP allocation, which is a configuration task not directly related to per packet routing decisions.
Common Pitfalls:
Students may confuse source routing with policy based routing or assume it is a purely theoretical concept. Others may misinterpret the term as meaning that the source simply picks a destination, which is always true in communication. The key distinguishing feature is that the sender lays out the path in the header, step by step. Remember this explicit path list when you see the term source route.
Final Answer:
Source routing refers to a technique where the sender specifies in the packet header the complete or partial path that the packet should follow through the network, as stated in option A.
Discussion & Comments