Algorithm representation: What do we call the short, structured statements that describe the steps a computer should follow to solve a problem (without using a specific programming language syntax)?

Introduction / Context:
Before coding, analysts and developers express logic in a form that is easy to read and reason about. Language-agnostic descriptions reduce misunderstandings and allow algorithm review without committing to syntax. The widely used technique is called pseudocode.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We need a textual, structured description of steps.
• It should be independent of any specific programming language.
• Clarity and sequence are more important than strict syntax.

Concept / Approach:
Pseudocode uses plain words and simple control-structure keywords (for example, IF, ELSE, WHILE, FOR) to outline logic. Because it avoids language details (types, punctuation), stakeholders can validate the algorithm quickly. Designers later map pseudocode to actual code, test cases, and flowcharts if needed.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Development methodologies and textbooks recommend pseudocode for design reviews and as a bridge to unit tests and implementation.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Flowcharts/flow diagrams: graphical, not textual.
• IPO charts: summarize inputs, processes, outputs at a high level, not detailed step logic.
• Pseudocharts: nonstandard term.

Common Pitfalls:
Writing pseudocode too close to a language (defeating readability) or too vague (losing testability). Balance clarity with precision.

Final Answer:
Pseudocode