Stereophotography — “want of correspondence” and its dependencies In overlapping aerial photographs, the want of correspondence (difficulty in matching homologous image points) has which characteristic?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: It is a function of tilt

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
“Want of correspondence” describes the inability to locate matching points on a stereo pair due to image distortions or scale differences. Minimizing it is essential for accurate stereo-compilation and parallax measurement.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Two overlapping photos intended for stereoscopic viewing.
  • Potential causes include camera tilt, height differences, lens distortions, time gap changes, and relief.


Concept / Approach:

Tilt introduces perspective differences and non-uniform scale across the photos, making homologous points harder to match. Differences in flying height between exposures also change scale, increasing want of correspondence. Therefore, want of correspondence is indeed a function of tilt (among other factors) and must be minimized by good flight planning and camera stabilization.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify main contributors → tilt, height change, relief, timing.Recognize effect → mismatched geometry between the two images.Mitigation → maintain consistent height and attitude; adequate overlap.


Verification / Alternative check:

Photogrammetric specifications set limits on average and differential tilt to control this problem, and require nominally constant flying height to maintain scale consistency.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • (a) It is detrimental, not desirable.
  • (c) False: flying height changes do affect correspondence via scale change.
  • (d) No special minimum at 3°; lower tilt is generally better.
  • (e) Focal length alone does not govern the effect.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Assuming large overlaps alone solve correspondence; attitude and height consistency also matter.


Final Answer:

It is a function of tilt.

More Questions from Advanced Surveying

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion