Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should Foreign Direct Investment be allowed in print media in India? Arguments: I. Yes. The entry of foreign investment will bring in healthy competition and the best of technology which is now confined to only a few publications. II. No. The foreign publications with their money and managerial power will overwhelm the weak Indian press, especially the regional press.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer:

Explanation:

I is a strong argument. Keeping the same motive into consideration, FDI in print media has recently been allowed in India. II is also strong because it is true that the money and managerial power of foreigners is likely to have a negative impact on the Indian press.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should corporal punishment be banned in schools? Arguments: I. Yes, if a student fails to perform well it should be released that it is due to the teacher's fault. Inculcation of value of ethics should be preferred to corporal punishment. II. No an adamant child can't be forced to study unless he/she is treated with corporal punishment.
Statement: Should the pension schemes in government services be abolished? Arguments: I. Yes, this will reduce the number of aspiring candidates to a great extent and it will be easy for the common man to get into govt services. II. No, this will destroy the very purpose of providing financial help to the employee so that they can sustain themselves in old age.
Statement: Should restriction on rickshaw-pullers and prisoners for donation of blood be removed? Arguments: I. Yes, by putting these restrictions, a large section of public are not able to donate their blood event their own relatives in emergencies. II. No, blood donation is men to save people's life; if fingers are pointed towards someone's eligibility as a donor owing to possibility of non suitable or erroneous blood, then such persons must be restricted from doing so.
Statement: Should TV channels is be allowed to telecast soft porn films? Arguments: I. Yes, it will help in satisfying youngsters' aphrodosiomania as a result of which cases related with woman 's molestation will reduce to some extent. II. No, it is against or tradition. Any such act will degrade our social value, especially for children, who use television as a medium of entertainment as well as education.
Statement: Should government hospitals charge user charges from those government employees who pay income taxes? Arguments: I. Yes. This will lessen the burden of the government and money thus accumulated will be helpful in providing more facilities to the needy . II. No. It will be an injustice towards those persons who pay income texes as a revenue to the country.
Statement: Should the habit of being absent from the class-room be checked in educational institutions? Arguments: I. Yes. Otherwise it will create a poor image of the institute in the society. II. No. This will be an act of encroaching upon one's liberty.
Statement: Should children be prevented completely form using the Internet? Arguments : I. No. Internet is a medium of education where children get education with entertainment. II. Yes. There are some sites available on Internet which show porno film or programmes etc, which affect the child's mind to a great extent; recent surveys have revealed most of the users of these sites are children.
Statement: Should there be a ban on the persons providing services to more than one firm or organisation? Arguments: I. Yes. It will reduce the problem of unemployment to some extent. II. No. It will create a lot of frustration and large amount of dissatisfaction and disappointment among the skillful and intellectual classes.
Statement: Should people be allowed to keep traditional arms while on a long train journey? Arguments: I. Yes. This will reduce the cases of train dacoities and other activities such as snatching chains or ornaments. II. No. This will create inconvenience to the passengers and aggravate the law and order situation.
Statement: Should there be a re-election in case the winner 's candidature is cancelled? Arguments: I. Yes, the winner represents the choice of the major portion of voters, and if his candidature is cancelled there must be a re-election to maintain the democratic ethos. II. No, it will be an injustice towards the person who stood second in the election.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion