Statement: ''Each one teach one'' is the best policy to spread elementary education in India . Arguments: I. Yes, if 60% literate people teach 40% illiterates Indians then it seems quite possible. II. No, people have no time to spend for development of the society because naturally they are more keen to earn their livelihood .

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong

Explanation:

II is not strong because no excuse can be put up against the society's development.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should the minimum age of 25 years for entry to bars and pubs be reduced? Arguments: I. Yes. A person is mature enough to differentiate between the good and the bad, the right and the wrong once he/she attains the age of 18-20 years, the age when one gets voting right . II. No. By this age, a person passes though various realities. It is usually after this age that one attains social maturity and economic independence. Reduction in this age limit would result in exposing the youth to risks owing to amateur decisions.
Statement: Should police pickets on road be not allowed to check luggages of travellers by stopping buses? Arguments: I. Yes. The move causes great inconvenience to travellers and contributes to some extent in causing traffic jams. II. No. The move will curtail the right of the police.
Statement: Should frequent strikes called by teachers be banned? Arguments: I. Yes. Going on strike every time affects the interests of then youngsters to a large extent. II. No. If teachers do their best for the students they must not be deprives of the platform to show their grievances.
Statement: Should there be a strict action against those who uses ancient rocks for advertisement purposes? Arguments: I. No. The cheapest and most cost-effective mode of advertisement must not be banned. II. Yes. It is necessary to conserve our heritage sites at any cost.
Statement: Should the provision to dissolve the assembly prematurely be amended? Arguments: I. Yes. On many occasions the provision has been used by ruling Governments to fulfil their vested interests. II. No. To fulfil the constitutional obligations and norms, it sometimes becomes the need of the hour to dissolve the assembly prematurely.
Statement: Should AIDS test be made mandatory in India for brides and grooms before marriage? Arguments: I. Yes. India is one of the countries where the number of AIDS victims is the highest. It is essential for India to make efforts to restrict the number of victims. II. No. It will be a humiliation of brides and grooms both.
Statement: Should there be a censor board for supervising advertisements issued by different companies? Arguments: I. No, It is impractical to have sensor boards for various purposes. II. Yes, On many occasion it has been witnessed that an advertisement has created a lot of debate by showing such scenes in the advertisement as are detrimental to our social fabric.
Statement: Should students be allowed to work while they are studying? Arguments: I. Yes. Economic background of every individual does not allow them to pursue education; such allowing therefore makes it feasible to fulfil one 's dream. II. Yes. Vocational education plays an important role to make a person self-sufficient. Besides, this practical knowledge becomes necessary to make studies meaningful.
Statement: Should the employer have the right to terminate the service of an employee on the ground of disability? Arguments: I. Yes. The employee plays an important role in achieving the employer 's objective. If an employee become unable to perform the role because of disability, the employer must have the right to terminate the service of the employee. II. No. Humanity can't be ignored. If our constitution facilitates reservation in jobs for the disabled, why think of termination of service if a normal person becomes disabled?
Statement: Should the person debarred from contesting election by the Election Commission be allowed to become the Chief minister of state? Arguments: I. No, because if a debarred person is allowed to hold the office of chief minister, he/she will not be able to become an MLA or MLC within the stipulated period of six months according to the Indian Constitution. II. Yes, we are a democracy ruled by people and not by law alone. Therefore judicial conviction should be set aside by people 's mandate.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion