Interpretation
- Statement I: The man is the only son of Tanya's grandfather, but the grandfather may also have daughters (e.g., Tanya's mother). Tanya could thus be the man's niece or daughter ⇒ ambiguous.
- Statement II: The man has no siblings, and his father is Tanya's grandfather ⇒ the grandfather has exactly one child (this man). Therefore Tanya, being a grandchild of that grandfather, must be the man's daughter.
Final Answer
Statement II alone is sufficient, but Statement I alone is not sufficient.
Discussion & Comments