Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Parabolic
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Understanding the shape of the velocity profile in pipe flow is fundamental for computing discharge, wall shear, and energy losses. For steady, fully developed laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe, the profile has a distinctive mathematical form.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
From the Navier–Stokes equations with the above assumptions, the solution is the Hagen–Poiseuille profile: velocity u decreases from a maximum at the centreline to zero at the wall due to the no-slip condition, following a quadratic (parabolic) dependence on radius.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Start with momentum balance in the axial direction for fully developed flow: pressure gradient is constant.Integrate twice with respect to radius and apply boundary conditions u = 0 at r = R (no slip) and finite du/dr at r = 0 (symmetry).Obtain u(r) = u_max * (1 − (r/R)^2), which is a parabola in r.Verification / Alternative check:
The average velocity u_avg equals one-half of u_max in laminar pipe flow, which is consistent only with a parabolic profile.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Elliptical, hyperbolic, or circular are not the functional form of the solution; a uniform (plug) profile contradicts the no-slip condition in laminar regime.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing turbulent (flatter) profiles with laminar ones; forgetting that the profile becomes parabolic only under fully developed conditions.
Final Answer:
Parabolic
Discussion & Comments