Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Run the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor on the classroom computers to detect hardware and software compatibility problems before installation.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When deploying an older operating system such as Windows XP Professional, especially on existing hardware and with preinstalled software, it is important to assess compatibility before performing installations. Microsoft provided a tool called the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor to analyze hardware and software and report potential issues. This question asks which step Sachin should have carried out to avoid classroom wide installation failures due to compatibility problems.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The Windows XP Upgrade Advisor is a free tool from Microsoft that scans a computer's hardware and installed software to identify potential compatibility problems with Windows XP. It produces a report listing devices that may not have drivers, applications that may not function correctly, and other issues. Running this tool before installation helps instructors and administrators decide whether the hardware is suitable and which drivers or upgrades may be needed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Recognize that the central issue in the scenario is compatibility, not user error in following installation steps.
2. Recall that Microsoft provided the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor specifically to evaluate compatibility before installing or upgrading to Windows XP.
3. Identify that Sachin could have run this tool on the classroom computers to generate reports highlighting problematic hardware or software.
4. Based on these reports, he could have updated drivers, removed incompatible applications, or chosen different machines for the lab exercises.
5. Therefore, the correct answer is the option that explicitly mentions running the XP Upgrade Advisor.
Verification / Alternative check:
Documentation for Windows XP deployment repeatedly recommends running the Upgrade Advisor on existing computers before performing upgrades or installations. The tool analyzes CPU, memory, disk space, peripherals, and installed programs, and then warns the administrator about incompatibilities. None of the other proposed steps provide such a targeted analysis for XP compatibility.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option b suggests running the XP Professional upgrade setup instead of a clean installation, but this does not itself avoid compatibility issues; incompatible hardware will still cause failures. Option c, using XP Home Edition as a test, does not accurately simulate XP Professional requirements and is not a recommended practice. Option d, installing a service pack before installing the base OS, is impossible; service packs can be applied only after XP is installed or integrated into the installation media (slipstreaming), which still does not substitute for compatibility analysis.
Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is to assume that if a system runs an older version of Windows it will automatically be able to run a newer or different edition without issues. Another pitfall is skipping compatibility testing in classroom or lab environments, which can lead to failed demonstrations and wasted time when hardware is not suitable. Using vendor tools such as the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor is an important part of proper deployment planning.
Final Answer:
Sachin should have run the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor on the classroom computers beforehand to detect and address hardware and software compatibility issues before attempting the installations.
Discussion & Comments