In computer graphics and engineering labs, what are the realistic benefits of deploying specialized graphics workstations versus relying entirely on a central host computer?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Reduces the host computer workload and allows more concurrent users

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Specialized graphics workstations are purpose built computers that handle intensive visualization, modeling, and rendering tasks. This question tests your understanding of how such workstations offload computation from a central host, enable scalability, and support multi user environments common in CAD, simulation, and visualization labs.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The environment includes a central host or server and multiple users.
  • Workloads include 3D modeling, visualization, or compute assisted design tasks.
  • We evaluate workload distribution, concurrency, and practical cost–benefit outcomes.


Concept / Approach:

A specialized workstation contains a capable CPU, GPU, memory subsystem, and optimized drivers. Offloading graphics pipelines and local preprocessing reduces contention on a central host. This enables more users to work simultaneously because heavy rendering and viewport updates are computed locally, while the host focuses on storage, collaboration, and light coordination services.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify workload types: modeling, shading, rasterization, and simulation pre and post processing are executed on the workstation rather than the host.2) Host load impact: when clients compute locally, the host processes fewer per frame or per interaction computations, reducing CPU and memory pressure.3) Concurrency: with less per user load on the host, more users can be supported without saturating centralized resources.4) Growth potential: modern workstations are highly scalable with additional memory, GPU upgrades, and software optimizations, so growth in 3D capability is not limited by the presence of workstations.5) Cost–performance: for many teams, distributed workstations deliver favorable throughput per user compared with a single oversized host, especially when interactive graphics are dominant.


Verification / Alternative check:

Benchmark comparisons typically show reduced host CPU usage and improved interactive frame rates when clients run on local workstations. User counts can increase before the host reaches saturation.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Option a is wrong because 3D growth is not inherently limited. Option c is incomplete since concurrency benefits are real. Option d overgeneralizes cost concerns; many deployments achieve strong cost–performance. Option e is incorrect because option b accurately describes the advantages.


Common Pitfalls:

Assuming a powerful host alone guarantees smooth graphics for many users, or ignoring driver and GPU acceleration benefits on clients.


Final Answer:

Reduces the host computer workload and allows more concurrent users

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion