Consider the observation: “Unity is rarely noticed when it is achieved.” How is this statement best evaluated in the context of social and political life?

Introduction / Context:
The statement “Unity is rarely noticed when it is achieved” is a reflective observation about how people perceive social and political conditions. In many communities and countries, long periods of peace and cooperation attract less attention than sudden conflicts or crises. This question asks you to evaluate the statement and decide which option best captures its meaning in real life. It is not a legal rule but a sociological and psychological insight about human attention and public discourse.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The statement suggests that unity often goes unnoticed, while division is more visible.
• The options include an evaluation that the statement is generally correct and alternatives that treat it as obviously wrong, as a mathematical law or as a legal definition.
• We assume everyday experience where news about conflict is more prominent than news about harmony.
• The correct answer should interpret the statement realistically rather than literally as law or definition.

Concept / Approach:
In social and political life, stable periods where groups cooperate and institutions function smoothly do not always make headlines. People tend to notice and discuss breakdowns, such as protests, violence or political crises, more than they notice quiet success. This is related to a general psychological tendency to focus on problems and threats. The statement captures that when unity is achieved, it can become part of the normal background and is therefore less remarked upon. Evaluating the statement as generally correct, rather than as a strict rule, fits both common sense and observation.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Reflect on what people talk about in news and social media. Conflict, scandals and crises usually get more attention than ordinary days when everything works well. Step 2: Option A says the statement is generally correct, explaining that people often notice conflict and division more than quiet unity. This interpretation matches common experience. Step 3: Option B claims the statement is generally incorrect and that unity is always obvious and more visible than conflict, which does not match how news and public discussions usually work. Step 4: Option C calls the statement a strict mathematical law, which is clearly exaggerated because social observations are not mathematical rules. Step 5: Option D treats the statement as a formal definition of democracy written into constitutional law, which is not true. Step 6: Therefore, option A is the best evaluation of the statement.

Verification / Alternative check:
To verify, think of examples from your own environment. When a neighbourhood lives peacefully for years, there may be little media coverage. However, if a conflict breaks out, it quickly becomes news. Similarly, when different political parties cooperate to pass a budget, this may receive less attention than a dramatic government collapse or heated argument. These examples support the idea that unity is often taken for granted, while division is more noticeable. The statement is therefore a reasonable generalisation, not an absolute rule, which supports the evaluation in option A.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B is wrong because it contradicts everyday experience, where unity is often quiet and conflict is noisy and attention grabbing.

Option C is wrong because the statement is not a mathematical law; social observations can have exceptions and are more like tendencies.

Option D is wrong because the statement is a reflective comment, not a legal or constitutional definition of democracy.

Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is to think that any statement presented in a question must be either perfectly true or completely false, without considering that it might be a general tendency with exceptions. Another mistake is to treat reflective or philosophical statements as if they were legal rules. To avoid these errors, read such statements as interpretations of social behaviour and ask whether they broadly match real life. When you recognise that people pay more attention to conflict than to quiet harmony, you can confidently agree that unity is often unnoticed when it is achieved.

Final Answer:
It is generally correct, because people often notice conflict and division more than quiet periods of unity.