Membrane protein biogenesis: Type I integral plasma membrane proteins are characterized by which signal/anchor arrangement during co-translational insertion into the ER membrane?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Cleavage N-terminal signal sequence and a hydrophobic stop-transfer sequence

Explanation:


Introduction:
Integral membrane proteins use topogenic signals to achieve correct orientation. Type I single-pass proteins have an N-terminal lumenal domain and a cytosolic C-terminus. Understanding how signal peptides and stop-transfer sequences coordinate insertion is essential for predicting topology from sequence.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Secretory pathway uses the signal recognition particle (SRP) and Sec61 translocon.
  • Signal peptides direct ribosome–nascent chains to the ER; signal peptidase can cleave them.
  • Hydrophobic segments can halt translocation and become transmembrane helices.


Concept / Approach:
Type I proteins begin with an N-terminal signal peptide that is cleaved in the ER lumen. Downstream, a hydrophobic stop-transfer sequence exits the lateral gate of the translocon to become the membrane-spanning helix, anchoring the protein with N-terminus in the lumen and C-terminus in the cytosol. This combination—cleaved signal peptide plus stop-transfer anchor—defines Type I topology.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Signal peptide emerges from the ribosome, binds SRP, and targets the complex to the ER membrane.Insertion through Sec61 begins; signal peptide is cleaved by signal peptidase in the lumen.A downstream hydrophobic segment acts as a stop-transfer sequence and partitions into the lipid bilayer.Translocation stops; the remainder of the protein is synthesized on the cytosolic side, producing Type I orientation.


Verification / Alternative check:
Protease protection assays and glycosylation mapping confirm N-lumenal/C-cytosolic orientation for Type I proteins; mutational loss of the stop-transfer helix disrupts membrane anchoring.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Signal as anchor itself (option b): true for signal-anchor (Type II/III), not Type I.
  • Multiple signals without stop-transfer: describes multi-pass topologies, not canonical Type I.
  • No signal sequence: most Type I proteins rely on SRP-dependent targeting.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing Type I (cleaved signal + stop-transfer) with Type II/III (internal signal-anchor) or assuming all hydrophobic stretches are equivalent in topogenesis.


Final Answer:
Cleavage N-terminal signal sequence and a hydrophobic stop-transfer sequence

More Questions from Protein Synthesis

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion