Two shafts of the same material: Shaft A is solid with diameter D; Shaft B is hollow with outer diameter D and inner diameter D/2. Comparing torsional strength (torque capacity at the same allowable shear stress), the hollow shaft is what fraction of the solid shaft?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 15/16

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Torsion design often favours hollow shafts because material is more effective away from the centre. This question compares the torsional strength (torque for a given maximum shear stress) of a solid versus a hollow circular shaft with the same outer diameter and material.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Material and allowable shear stress are the same.
  • Outer diameter for both shafts is D; hollow shaft has inner diameter D/2.
  • Strength comparison is based on torque at the same maximum shear stress.


Concept / Approach:
For circular shafts, torsional strength T is related to polar section modulus Zp: T = τ_max * Zp. For a solid shaft, Zp_solid = (π/16) * D^3. For a hollow shaft, Zp_hollow = J/R = [(π/32) * (D^4 − d^4)] / (D/2).



Step-by-Step Solution:

Let d = D/2 → d^4 = (D/2)^4 = D^4 / 16.Compute J_hollow = (π/32) * (D^4 − D^4/16) = (π/32) * (15/16) * D^4.Compute Zp_hollow = J_hollow / (D/2) = (π/16) * (15/16) * D^3.Compute Zp_solid = (π/16) * D^3.Strength ratio = Zp_hollow / Zp_solid = 15/16.


Verification / Alternative check:
Because most torque resistance comes from outer fibres, removing the core barely reduces strength: 15/16 ≈ 0.9375, confirming high efficiency of hollow sections.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1/16, 1/8, 1/4 drastically underestimate strength; they ignore the outer-radius dominance in torsion.



Common Pitfalls:
Comparing polar moments J (stiffness-related) instead of polar modulus Zp (strength-related); forgetting to divide J by outer radius for strength.



Final Answer:

15/16

More Questions from Strength of Materials

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion