Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 15/16
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Torsion design often favours hollow shafts because material is more effective away from the centre. This question compares the torsional strength (torque for a given maximum shear stress) of a solid versus a hollow circular shaft with the same outer diameter and material.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For circular shafts, torsional strength T is related to polar section modulus Zp: T = τ_max * Zp. For a solid shaft, Zp_solid = (π/16) * D^3. For a hollow shaft, Zp_hollow = J/R = [(π/32) * (D^4 − d^4)] / (D/2).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Because most torque resistance comes from outer fibres, removing the core barely reduces strength: 15/16 ≈ 0.9375, confirming high efficiency of hollow sections.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1/16, 1/8, 1/4 drastically underestimate strength; they ignore the outer-radius dominance in torsion.
Common Pitfalls:
Comparing polar moments J (stiffness-related) instead of polar modulus Zp (strength-related); forgetting to divide J by outer radius for strength.
Final Answer:
15/16
Discussion & Comments