Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 4
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a classic trick logic puzzle designed to test your careful reading rather than your knowledge of animals. The question lists the number of eyes of a giraffe, a monkey, and an elephant, each having two eyes, and then asks how many eyes we have. The use of the word we is deliberate and invites you to consider who is included in that group. Many people rush to answer based on the animals alone, but the real focus is on the human participants in the conversation implied by the word we.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The key concept is understanding pronoun reference. The earlier part of the sentence about animals is only there to distract you and get you thinking about the number two in each case. However, the final question does not ask how many eyes the animals have. Instead, it asks how many eyes we have, shifting the focus to the humans involved. Under the usual interpretation, we refers to two people, each with two eyes, so the total is four eyes. Carefully re reading the question is essential to spotting the trick.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Note that the giraffe, monkey, and elephant each have two eyes, but this information is not directly used in the final question.
Step 2: Identify the pronoun we in the question How many eyes do we have.
Step 3: Interpret we as referring to the two individuals involved in the conversation, a questioner and a problem solver.
Step 4: Each human typically has two eyes.
Step 5: Therefore, the total number of eyes we have is 2 + 2 = 4.
Step 6: The animals provide a context that can mislead you into focusing on them, but they are not included in the we.
Verification / Alternative check:
You can rephrase the puzzle as follows. A giraffe has two eyes, a monkey has two eyes, and an elephant has two eyes. You and I are now talking about this. How many eyes do we have between us. In this clearer phrasing, it is obvious that we refers to you and me, so the total is four eyes. The animal information remains correct but irrelevant to the final count, confirming that the solution depends entirely on pronoun interpretation rather than on arithmetic with the animals.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
An answer like 2 assumes that we refers to a single person or mistakenly focuses only on the answerers eyes. An answer of 3 or 1 does not match any reasonable grouping of standard human eyes. Counting all the animals plus the humans would give a different number entirely, but the wording clearly separates the animals from we. Therefore, only 4 is consistent with we meaning two humans.
Common Pitfalls:
The main pitfall is reading quickly and summing animal eyes or assuming that we refers to only one person. Trick puzzles often embed the real question in a distracting context. Training yourself to slow down, notice pronouns, and confirm what group is being counted will help you avoid such traps. This habit is especially helpful in logical reasoning sections where wording is carefully chosen to misdirect inattentive readers.
Final Answer:
Under the natural interpretation that we refers to two human participants in the conversation, we have 4 eyes in total.
Discussion & Comments