Which tribunal in India banned the use of Chinese kite strings made of nylon or other synthetic material from July 2017 due to safety and environmental concerns?

Introduction / Context:
Chinese kite strings, often made from nylon or other synthetic materials and popularly called Chinese manjha, have caused injuries to birds and humans and created environmental hazards in many Indian cities. In response, a tribunal in India ordered a ban on these synthetic strings. The question tests your knowledge of which tribunal issued this ban and also indirectly checks whether you can link environmental issues with the appropriate judicial body.

Given Data / Assumptions:

- The ban applies to Chinese kite strings made of nylon or other synthetic materials. - The ban began in July 2017. - You need to identify the tribunal that issued the ban. - The options list several tribunals including the National Green Tribunal.

Concept / Approach:
The key concept is understanding which tribunal handles environmental matters. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) deals specifically with cases related to environmental protection, forest conservation, and similar issues. Since the question is about environmental and safety concerns related to synthetic kite strings, the logical tribunal is the NGT. Other tribunals in the options focus on consumer disputes, industrial relations, or administrative service matters, which are not directly related to this issue.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognize that the problem involves environmental damage and public safety due to synthetic kite strings. Step 2: Recall that environmental cases in India are normally taken up by the National Green Tribunal. Step 3: Compare the names of tribunals in the options and identify which one is environment focused. Step 4: National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission deals mainly with consumer product disputes; Industrial Tribunals handle industrial relations; Central Administrative Tribunal deals with service matters of government employees. Step 5: Therefore, the only tribunal that fits the environmental nature of the ban is the National Green Tribunal.

Verification / Alternative check:
You can confirm this by checking official orders or news coverage from July 2017, which clearly attribute the nationwide ban on Chinese manjha to orders of the National Green Tribunal. Reports often mention that the NGT cited harm to birds, risk to human life, and non biodegradable waste as reasons for the prohibition.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission: This body resolves disputes between consumers and businesses and does not typically issue broad environmental bans. - Industrial Tribunals: These tribunals handle conflicts between employers and workers, not environmental safety rules. - Central Administrative Tribunal: It focuses on service related issues of public servants and has no jurisdiction for banning harmful products at a national level.

Common Pitfalls:
Some candidates confuse the roles of different tribunals or assume that any national level ban must come from the Supreme Court or Parliament. Others may not be familiar with the abbreviation NGT and thus overlook the correct option. To avoid these mistakes, it is useful to remember that the National Green Tribunal is specifically set up to handle environmental and ecological issues.

Final Answer:
The tribunal that banned Chinese nylon and other synthetic kite strings in July 2017 was the National Green Tribunal (NGT).