Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Transducers are everywhere in measurement and control systems, bridging the physical world and electronics. A correct conceptual understanding is fundamental when selecting sensors and actuators. This question tests the basic definition of a transducer and whether it indeed performs energy conversion between domains (mechanical, thermal, optical, electrical, etc.).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A transducer is any device that converts energy from one form to another. Sensors convert physical stimuli into electrical signals (e.g., a thermocouple converts heat differences into voltage). Actuators convert electrical energy into other forms (e.g., a loudspeaker converts electrical signals into sound pressure waves). The conversion can be direct (thermoelectric, piezoelectric) or via an intermediate field (capacitive/inductive). Therefore, a statement that a transducer does not convert energy is contrary to its very definition.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Instrumentation standards and textbooks consistently define transducers as energy converters. Even “passive” devices like resistive temperature detectors convert thermal energy variation into an electrical resistance change that is interpreted electrically, satisfying the conversion principle.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct”: negates the definition.
“Correct only for passive sensors/active sensors”: both still involve energy-domain transduction.
“Applies only in digital systems”: the digital/analog distinction is orthogonal to energy conversion.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing signal amplification (which may or may not convert energy domains) with transduction; assuming energy conversion requires power flow comparable to macroscopic actuators—many sensors convert with very small energies.
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments