Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 80 years
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Primary consolidation time depends on drainage path, permeability, and compressibility. For a given degree of consolidation (e.g., 90%), the time scales with the square of the drainage path and inversely with the coefficient of consolidation Cv. This question checks proportional reasoning without requiring tables of Tv.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For a fixed U (degree of consolidation), t ∝ H_dr^2 / Cv. Also, Cv = k / (mv * gamma_w). If k → 3k and mv → 4mv, then Cv_new = (3/4) Cv_old. With H_dr doubling, H_dr^2 scales by 2^2 = 4. Therefore the new time factor multiplies by 4 / (3/4) = 4 * (4/3) = 16/3 ≈ 5.333.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Since U is fixed, Tv cancels. The strong dependence on H_dr^2 explains why doubling thickness dominates the increase in time even though permeability improves.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
70, 75, and 85 years reflect partial consideration (e.g., using only H^2 or only Cv changes) but not both. 60 years would require higher Cv or smaller H than stated.
Common Pitfalls:
Using total thickness instead of drainage path, ignoring whether single or double drainage applies, or forgetting Cv depends on both k and mv.
Final Answer:
80 years
Discussion & Comments