Axonometric categories — equal foreshortening on two axes Which axonometric drawing type uses the same foreshortening along two axis directions and a different foreshortening along the third axis?

Introduction / Context:
Axonometric projections help visualize 3D shapes without perspective. Understanding the differences among isometric, dimetric, and trimetric projections ensures the correct balance between visual clarity and construction effort.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• No perspective foreshortening; projection lines are parallel.
• We compare relative axis scales.
• Standard drafting definitions are assumed.

Concept / Approach:
Dimetric projection features two equal foreshortening scales and one distinct scale. This makes certain faces less distorted than in isometric, while avoiding the per-axis uniqueness required by trimetric.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Choose two axes to share a common scale factor.Assign a different scale to the third axis based on the chosen angles.Construct edges along each axis with their respective scales.Dimension critically, noting the two-equal/one-different relationship.

Verification / Alternative check:
Isometric uses three equal scales; trimetric uses three different scales. Dimetric uniquely fits the “two equal, one different” description.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Multiview: orthographic projections, not axonometric.
• Isometric: all three equal.
• Trimetric: all three different.

Common Pitfalls:
Applying isometric angles to a dimetric drawing or dimensioning without noting which axes share scale leads to visual inconsistency.

Final Answer:
Dimetric