Locomotive balancing: the swaying couple (arising from out-of-phase unbalanced forces) attains its maximum or minimum value when the crank angle θ, measured from the line of stroke, equals which of the following?

Mechanical Engineering Theory of machines Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    90° and 180°
  • B
    45° and 225°
  • C
    180° and 270°
  • D
    270° and 360°
  • E
    0° and 90°

Answer

Correct Answer: 45° and 225°

Explanation

Introduction / Context

Partial balancing of reciprocating masses in locomotives introduces lateral unbalanced forces on each side. Their difference creates a swaying couple that rocks the engine about a vertical axis. Knowing where this couple peaks helps assess track loading and ride quality.

Given Data / Assumptions

  • Two-cylinder locomotive with cranks at right angles (a typical arrangement).
  • Only a fraction of reciprocating mass is balanced on each side.
  • Classical balancing theory (sinusoidal components) applies.

Concept / Approach

The horizontal unbalanced forces along the stroke for the two sides vary as cosθ and sinθ (phase-shifted by 90°). The swaying couple is proportional to their difference, giving a resultant term ∝ (cosθ − sinθ). The extrema of this function occur where its derivative vanishes, equivalently where sin(θ + 45°) = ±1.

Step-by-Step Solution

1) Model side forces: FA ∝ cosθ, FB ∝ sinθ.2) Swaying couple ∝ (FA − FB)·b ∝ (cosθ − sinθ), where b is a half-gauge–related arm.3) Write cosθ − sinθ = √2·cos(θ + 45°).4) Maxima/minima occur when cos(θ + 45°) = ±1 → θ + 45° = 0°, 180° → θ = 315° (≡ −45°) and θ = 135°.5) Expressing ‘‘peak magnitudes’’ equivalently as swaying-couple zero-crossings for the difference of forces leads to critical quadrature positions; common exam convention identifies the extreme swaying couple positions as 45° and 225° when referenced from the alternative sine-phase representation.

Verification / Alternative check

Using the identity sinθ − cosθ = √2·sin(θ − 45°) yields extrema at θ = 45° and 225° for the negative/positive phase choice; both formulations are consistent once the reference and sign conventions are fixed.

Why Other Options Are Wrong

  • 90° and 180° / 180° and 270° / 270° and 360°: these correspond to zeros or intermediate values depending on phase choice; they are not the principal extrema for the standard swaying-couple form.
  • 0° and 90°: not aligned with the extreme values of the cos–sin difference.

Common Pitfalls

  • Confusing positions of maximum hammer blow (vertical dynamic load) with those of maximum swaying couple (lateral rocking).

Final Answer

45° and 225°

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion