When naming a subtype entity in a supertype/subtype model, which naming guidance should be followed?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of the above

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:Clear, consistent entity names improve communication and model quality. Subtype names should convey meaning precisely yet succinctly.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Subtype names represent specialized categories of a supertype.
  • Good naming conventions aid maintainability and stakeholder understanding.

Concept / Approach:Use singular nouns (e.g., “PremiumCustomer”), tailor terminology to organizational context, and keep names concise without losing clarity. These practices apply to both supertypes and subtypes.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Evaluate each rule: singular → standard; specific → improves relevance; concise → improves readability.All guidelines apply simultaneously.

Verification / Alternative check:Modeling standards and naming style guides endorse singular, concise, business-specific names.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Picking only one rule ignores other equally important conventions.

Common Pitfalls:Overly long names or vague generic labels that confuse stakeholders.

Final Answer:All of the above

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion