Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The analogy suggests the internet could be a transformative economic driver for India, akin to oil for West Asia. We must locate minimal assumptions required for this analogy to hold.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Analogies of transformational potential require only that the sector can materially reshape an economy; they do not necessitate majority control or monopoly.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Assumption I: “Most IT entrepreneurs are Indians” is irrelevant to the analogy; not implicit.2) Assumption II: The claim does not require monopoly—many transformative sectors exist without monopolies. Not implicit.
Verification / Alternative check:
Countries can benefit greatly from sectors they do not monopolize (e.g., electronics, services, tourism).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options implying I or II mistake “scale and impact” for “dominance or exclusivity.”
Common Pitfalls:
Reading “like oil” as “monopoly like OPEC dominance,” which the sentence does not entail.
Final Answer:
if neither I nor II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments