Statement–Assumption — “The Net can be for India what oil was for West Asia.” Assumptions: I. Most IT entrepreneurs in the world are Indians. II. India can have a monopoly in the global IT sector.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is implicit.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The analogy suggests the internet could be a transformative economic driver for India, akin to oil for West Asia. We must locate minimal assumptions required for this analogy to hold.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The Net has large value-creation potential.
  • India can harness significant benefits from the Net.
  • No claim about global entrepreneur demographics or monopoly is necessary.


Concept / Approach:
Analogies of transformational potential require only that the sector can materially reshape an economy; they do not necessitate majority control or monopoly.



Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Assumption I: “Most IT entrepreneurs are Indians” is irrelevant to the analogy; not implicit.2) Assumption II: The claim does not require monopoly—many transformative sectors exist without monopolies. Not implicit.



Verification / Alternative check:
Countries can benefit greatly from sectors they do not monopolize (e.g., electronics, services, tourism).



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options implying I or II mistake “scale and impact” for “dominance or exclusivity.”



Common Pitfalls:
Reading “like oil” as “monopoly like OPEC dominance,” which the sentence does not entail.



Final Answer:
if neither I nor II is implicit.

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion