Usability comparisons in DBMSs:\nAssess the claim:\n\n"The DBMS ranked as the hardest to use in the text is Microsoft SQL Server."

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Vendor comparisons often discuss ease of use. Microsoft SQL Server is widely considered approachable due to integrated tooling (SQL Server Management Studio, installers, wizards). The statement claims the opposite, suggesting it is the “hardest to use.”


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Introductory texts typically present SQL Server as relatively easy to install and administer for beginners on Windows.
  • Enterprise-grade DBMSs with broader platform complexity (e.g., Oracle with RAC/ASM) are often viewed as more complex to master.


Concept / Approach:
Consider common learning curves, tooling, and community materials. SQL Server’s ecosystem emphasizes approachability; therefore the claim that it is the “hardest to use” is not representative of mainstream teaching or practice.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify typical “hardest” contenders: those with the steepest learning curves. Contrast with SQL Server’s GUI tools, documentation, and default configurations. Conclude the claim is inaccurate in general educational contexts.


Verification / Alternative check:
Instructor syllabi and certification tracks frequently begin with SQL Server or MySQL precisely because of their tooling and community support.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Conditional variants attempt to rescue the claim with narrow circumstances; as a general statement it remains incorrect.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing market share or enterprise features with difficulty; assuming “hardest” without considering tooling maturity.


Final Answer:
Incorrect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion