Intended audience of database applications:\nJudge the statement:\n\n"Database applications are seldom intended for use by a single user."

Introduction / Context:
The question probes whether typical database applications are designed for solitary use or multi-user scenarios. Understanding concurrency, isolation, and scalability starts with recognizing that most practical applications serve many users simultaneously.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• “Seldom” means “infrequently” or “not the norm.”
• Common examples include e-commerce, banking, HR, CRM, and analytics—each inherently multi-user.
• Single-user databases exist (e.g., personal data files), but they are the minority in enterprise contexts.

Concept / Approach:
Multi-user requirements drive DBMS features such as transactional isolation, locking/MVCC, privileges, auditing, and connection pooling. If single-user were the dominant case, much of this machinery would be unnecessary or greatly simplified.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Usage metrics for popular DBMSs (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle) overwhelmingly reflect multi-session, multi-user deployments in production systems.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Incorrect: would imply multi-user scenarios are rare, which contradicts industry reality.
• Conditional variants: multi-user applies broadly across OLTP and OLAP, web and desktop clients connected to shared servers.

Common Pitfalls:
Generalizing from personal or classroom projects (often single-user) to professional systems; underestimating concurrency demands as systems scale.

Final Answer:
Correct