Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Speaker-dependent recognition
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Speech recognition systems contend with variability across speakers: pitch, accent, articulation, and microphone conditions. Different system designs trade convenience for robustness. The question asks which approach sidesteps inter-speaker variation by design.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Speaker-dependent recognition is trained on a specific user’s voice and pronunciation. Because the acoustic and language models are adapted to one person, the system avoids the hardest generalization challenges across the population. In contrast, continuous/isolated/connected refer to how speech is segmented and processed, not to whether models are personalized.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the source of difficulty: inter-speaker variability.Select the approach that personalizes models to a single speaker.Confirm that task mode (continuous vs. isolated) does not inherently solve cross-speaker variability.Choose “speaker-dependent recognition.”
Verification / Alternative check:
In practice, speaker-dependent systems historically achieved higher accuracy with limited vocabularies by requiring enrollment. Modern systems use speaker-independent models with adaptation, but the direct way to avoid variability is speaker dependence.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Continuous, isolated, connected: These describe temporal constraints and segmentation, not personalization to a speaker.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “isolated word” with robustness; while easier, it still faces cross-speaker acoustic differences if models are not personalized.
Final Answer:
Speaker-dependent recognition
Discussion & Comments