Syllogism — Good men and wise men (disjoint “some” groups possible): Statements: I. Some men are good. II. Some men are wise. Conclusions: I. Some wise men are good. II. Some good men are wise.

Introduction / Context:
Two existential premises can be satisfied by disjoint subsets. Without a premise linking “good” and “wise,” overlap is not compelled.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• ∃ (Man ∩ Good).
• ∃ (Man ∩ Wise).

Concept / Approach:
Both conclusions require the intersection Good ∩ Wise among Men to be non-empty. The premises allow that intersection to be empty because they never assert any relationship between Good and Wise.

Verification / Alternative check:
A model with some good-but-not-wise men and some wise-but-not-good men satisfies the premises while falsifying both conclusions.

Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.