Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Destruction
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Here the relationship is “cause → typical adverse effect.” Smoke is a common cause or sign of air pollution; war typically leads to widespread destruction. We must choose the parallel adverse outcome for “War.”
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Align the semantics: both second terms should be adverse consequences. “Destruction” is the prototypical harmful effect of war, just as pollution is for smoke. Terms like victory or defeat focus on winners/losers, not the broader societal effect, and “treaty” is a resolution, not a consequence of the act itself.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider neutral or positive possibilities: war can end with treaties or victories, but those are outcomes of the conflict process, not its typical adverse effect. Destruction consistently follows from warfare, preserving the analogy.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “result” that is procedural (treaty) or partisan (victory/defeat) with a universal negative consequence (destruction).
Final Answer:
Destruction
Discussion & Comments